This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

CSCR-066 Make negationInd 0..1 optional throughout

From HL7Wiki
Revision as of 22:47, 24 August 2006 by Adperry (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Editing of Change Requests is restricted to the submitter and the co-chairs of the Clinical Statement Project. Other changes will be undone. Please add comments to the "discussion" page associated with this Change Request.

Back to Clinical Statement Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Rik Smithies Revision date: 19-Jun-2006
Submitted date: 19-Jun-2006 Change request ID: CSCR-066


NegationInd is present in ObservationRange and Criterion as [1..1] default "false". (Strangely these are neither required nor mandatory, so are 1..1 optional.) Most other negationInd attributes in the model are [0..1] optional, the exception being SourceOf2 and SourceOf1, where it is [0..1] required (it seems a little strange to have a boolean value as 'required').

Models that make use of code systems that include concepts similar to negationInd have no need for this attribute and should be able to refine it out totally. An alternative that has been used is for models that don't need negationInd to make it mandatory with fixed value "false", but this seems unnecessary and wasteful, although that would still be possible.


  • Make all negationInd attributes 0..1 Optional default "false". Specifically this means changing ObservationRange, Criterion, SourceOf2 and SourceOf1.


This means negationInd can be refined out completely in models that don't need them.


24 August 2006

Agreed to split the motion to make negationInd optional on ObservationRange and Criterion and act relationships seperatly.

Recommended Action Items


24 August 2006

Regarding NegationInd in ObservationRange and Criterion:

Motion proposed by Rik, seconded Patrick

Motion passed. Against: 0 Abstain: 0 For: Davera Gabriel, Patrick Loyd , Rik Smithies, Hans Buitendijk, Andrew Perry, Charlie Bishop

Regarding NegationInd in act relationships:

There was no consensus ... Rik to post discussion on MnM