Difference between revisions of "CSCR-050 Make ObservationRange.negationInd and Criterion.negationInd optional"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
| + | 2 March 2006 | ||
| + | 1stP-M-J, 2nd AK: Accept proposal. Against 0 Abstain 0 For 8 . Approved.Hans Buitendijk, Isobel Frean, Andrew Perry, Rik Smithies; Patrick Mitchell-Jones, Austin Kreisler Heath Frankel, Patrick Lloyd | ||
| + | |||
| + | 20 April 2006 | ||
| + | CSP v0.2.3 updated - CVB | ||
Latest revision as of 14:34, 20 April 2006
Editing of Change Requests is restricted to the submitter and the co-chairs of the Clinical Statement Project. Other changes will be undone. Please add comments to the "discussion" page associated with this Change Request.
Back to Clinical Statement Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Rik Smithies | Revision date: 12-Feb-2006 |
| Submitted date: 12-Feb-2006 | Change request ID: CSCR-050 |
Issue
ObservationRange.negationInd and Criterion.negationInd are [1..1] required
Recommendation
- Change ObservationRange.negationInd and Criterion.negationInd to be [0..1] optional
Rationale
Terminfo guidance and thinking in NHS/UK domain, rules out the use of negationInd when act.code contains a code from a scheme that already encompasses negation (eg SnomedCT). Currently negationInd cannot be refined out in models that mandate such a coding scheme, leading to potential inconsistency.
Discussion
Negation is a liabilty. If not using SNOMED you still need to say it.
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
2 March 2006 1stP-M-J, 2nd AK: Accept proposal. Against 0 Abstain 0 For 8 . Approved.Hans Buitendijk, Isobel Frean, Andrew Perry, Rik Smithies; Patrick Mitchell-Jones, Austin Kreisler Heath Frankel, Patrick Lloyd
20 April 2006 CSP v0.2.3 updated - CVB
