This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CSCR-023 Relationship Attributes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
− | + | 20 April 2006 | |
− | * | + | *Meeting lost quorum, however the following was discussed: |
+ | **Agreed in principle | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
Motion (First, second): Motion | Motion (First, second): Motion | ||
Against: 0; Abstain: X; In Favor: Z | Against: 0; Abstain: X; In Favor: Z |
Revision as of 21:31, 28 September 2006
Back to Clinical Statement Change Requests page.
Submitted by: Charlie Bishop | Revision date: ? |
Submitted date: 08 March 2005 | Change request ID: CSCR-023 |
(Copied from HL7 Website Meeting Minutes and original Change Request)
Issue
Need to be able to convey more information about the nature of the relationships between Clinical Statements
Recommendation
Add the following attributes to ActChoice.sourceOf1 and ActChoice.sourceOf2/targetOf:
- inversionInd - cardinality [1..1], conformance Mandatory and default of “false”
- negationInd - cardinality [1..1], conformance Mandatory and default of “false”
- seperatableInd - cardinality [1..1], conformance Mandatory and default of “true”
Rationale
All of these attributes are used by NPfIT
- inversionInd allows the semantic of the relationship to be reversed without changing the clinical statement that is the source act and hence the supplier of the context to the relationship
- negationInd allows the semantic of the relationship to be negated (does NOT have Cause)
- seperatableInd allows the sender to state that the source act should not be interpreted without referring to the target act.
Discussion
20 April 2006
- Meeting lost quorum, however the following was discussed:
- Agreed in principle
Resolution
Motion (First, second): Motion Against: 0; Abstain: X; In Favor: Z