This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CSCR-021 Cardinality of AR Attributes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
− | Motion (First, second): | + | Motion (First, second): as submitted |
− | Against: 0; Abstain: | + | *Against: 0; Abstain: 4; In Favor: 4 |
+ | Charlie Bishop, Davera Gabriel, Patrick Loyd, Andrew Perry, Dan Russler [chair] |
Revision as of 21:34, 28 September 2006
Back to Clinical Statement Change Requests page.
Submitted by: Charlie Bishop | Revision date: ? |
Submitted date: 08 March 2005 | Change request ID: CSCR-021 |
(Copied from HL7 Website Meeting Minutes and original Change Request)
Issue
Attributes of Act Relationships that use the BL data type have inconsistent cardinalities and conformance requirements.
Recommendation
All Act Relationship attributes of BL data type should have cardinality [1..1] and conformance Mandatory. The following should be amended:
- Organizer.component.contextConductionInd
- Organizer.component.seperatableInd
- Observation.referenceRange.contextConductionInd
- ActChoice.conditions.contextConductionInd
- ObservationRange.precondition.contextConductionInd
- Criterion.precondition.contextConductionInd
Rationale
These attributes are included to ensure the quality of the clinical information being communicated. There is therefore little value in not requiring them to be included in the message instance.
Discussion
09-Mon-200X
- Initial points
Resolution
Motion (First, second): as submitted
- Against: 0; Abstain: 4; In Favor: 4
Charlie Bishop, Davera Gabriel, Patrick Loyd, Andrew Perry, Dan Russler [chair]