This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CSCR-020 conjunctionCode"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
| − | + | 20 April 2006 | |
| − | * | + | *NONE |
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
Motion (First, second): Motion | Motion (First, second): Motion | ||
Against: 0; Abstain: X; In Favor: Z | Against: 0; Abstain: X; In Favor: Z | ||
Revision as of 21:33, 28 September 2006
Back to Clinical Statement Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Charlie Bishop | Revision date: ? |
| Submitted date: 08 March 2005 | Change request ID: CSCR-020 |
(Copied from HL7 Website Meeting Minutes and original Change Request)
Issue
conjunctionCode is required in relationships between clinical statements
Recommendation
Add conjunctionCode with a cardinality of [0..1], conformance of ‘Required’ and no default value to the following act relationships:
- ActChoice.sourceOf1
- ActChoice.sourceOf2/targetOf
Rationale
The conjunctionCode allows explicit statement of combined and alternate relationships, for example:
- A has reason (B AND C)
- R has trigger (S OR T)
Discussion
20 April 2006
- NONE
Resolution
Motion (First, second): Motion Against: 0; Abstain: X; In Favor: Z
