This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CSCR-020 conjunctionCode"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
| − | 20 April | + | 20 April 2005 |
*NONE | *NONE | ||
Latest revision as of 22:08, 28 September 2006
Back to Clinical Statement Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Charlie Bishop | Revision date: ? |
| Submitted date: 08 March 2005 | Change request ID: CSCR-020 |
(Copied from HL7 Website Meeting Minutes and original Change Request)
Issue
conjunctionCode is required in relationships between clinical statements
Recommendation
Add conjunctionCode with a cardinality of [0..1], conformance of ‘Required’ and no default value to the following act relationships:
- ActChoice.sourceOf1
- ActChoice.sourceOf2/targetOf
Rationale
The conjunctionCode allows explicit statement of combined and alternate relationships, for example:
- A has reason (B AND C)
- R has trigger (S OR T)
Discussion
20 April 2005
- NONE
Resolution
Motion (First, second): as submitted
- Against: 0; Abstain: 4; In Favor: 4
Charlie Bishop, Davera Gabriel, Patrick Loyd, Andrew Perry, Dan Russler [chair]
