This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CSCR-018 Patient Or Related"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
− | + | 23 March 2005 | |
− | * | + | *NONE |
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
− | Motion ( | + | Motion (Bob, Charlie): as submitted |
− | Against: 0; Abstain: | + | *Against: 0; Abstain: 1; In Favor: 4 |
+ | |||
+ | Charlie Bishop, Heath Frankel, Hans Buttendijk, David Rowed [Chair], Bob Dolin, Dan Russler |
Latest revision as of 22:06, 28 September 2006
Back to Clinical Statement Change Requests page.
Submitted by: David Markwell | Revision date: ? |
Submitted date: 02 March 2005 | Change request ID: CSCR-018 |
(Copied from HL7 Website Meeting Minutes and original Change Request)
Name
Remove choice PatientOrRelated and tidy recordTarget participation
Issue
- In the current Clinical Statement DMIM there is a choice called PatientOrRelated it has no common entry or exit points and the two roles in the choice. Therefore this choice should be removed.
- There is a related cosmetic issue with the DMIM as it appears that the recordTarget is a “RelatedEntity” role. In fact the connection is (correctly) to patient so this is just a layout problem.
Recommendation
- Remove the PatientOrRelated role choice and place the roles it contains as direct members of the choice PatientOrRelatedOrSpecimen role choice.
- Move the recordTarget participations so its appearance conforms with its connections points.
Rationale
- The PatientOrRelated role choice serves no purpose in the current model since so relationships enter or leave it.
- The layout is misleading with respect to the role that participates as recordTarget.
Discussion
23 March 2005
- NONE
Resolution
Motion (Bob, Charlie): as submitted
- Against: 0; Abstain: 1; In Favor: 4
Charlie Bishop, Heath Frankel, Hans Buttendijk, David Rowed [Chair], Bob Dolin, Dan Russler