Difference between revisions of "CMHAFF call, Tuesday June 20"

Revision as of 21:27, 19 June 2017

Attendees: _____

Agenda:

Update on Friday's call -- plan to go for STU in January
Discussion of European response to request for participation thus far (Adamu, Frank Ploeg...)
Review of French mHealth Good Practice Guidelines) and impact on cMHAFF.
- Should we adopt the 3 "levels of criticality" (or similar concept) for cMHAFF?
- Which of the French categories are applicable to cMHAFF and which are not?
- Request for volunteers to recommend which other references (from French bibliography) to review for cMHAFF. How can we do due diligence without being overwhelmed with reading and "analysis paralysis?"
- Request for volunteers to "divide and conquer" re mapping of French guidelines and recommendations for incorporation into cMHAFF. The end result must be non-realm-specific conformance criteria (though country-specific EXAMPLES, e.g., USA and France, are permissible). Perhaps borrow from EHRS-FM language.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 **Which of the French categories are applicable to cMHAFF and which are not?
 **Request for volunteers to recommend which other references (from French bibliography) to review for cMHAFF. How can we do due diligence without being overwhelmed with reading and "analysis paralysis?"
-**Request for volunteers to "divide and conquer" re mapping of French guidelines and recommendations for incorporation into cMHAFF.
+**Request for volunteers to "divide and conquer" re mapping of French guidelines and recommendations for incorporation into cMHAFF. The end result must be non-realm-specific conformance criteria (though country-specific EXAMPLES, e.g., USA and France, are permissible). Perhaps borrow from EHRS-FM language.