Difference between revisions of "CMHAFF call, Thursday, August 24"

Revision as of 00:57, 24 August 2017

ATTENDEES:

AGENDA:

Review/Approve specific content changes
- DKT4 New decision tree -- is this a good basis?
- DKT11 Any recommendation on a "secure coding" reference?
- DKT15 Should Usability conformance criteria be consolidated?
- DKT32 Is automatic timeout justified as SHALL?
- DKT36-37 "syncing" data and "pairing" of devices: should they be within the same section?
- DKT39 decision on what to do with provenance discussion
- DKT40-42 new "Interoperability" section: should more be said?
- DKT48 revisit "Conditions and Agreements" and how it differs from "Informing Consumers/Users"
- DKT54 Is there a good starting point or reference for a Glossary? Should we have our own?
- DKT55 Should Windows platform considerations be included or not?
San Diego September HL7 WGM considerations
- Review preliminary cMHAFF presentation for September (San Diego) HL7 WGM
- Plan which topics are most in need of discussion for face-to-face time in San Diego

NEXT WEEK

Nathan agreed to recommend which (if any) criteria from Finland should be added to cMHAFF. This will be done on August 31st.
- File:National authorisation criteria of Finnish PHR v2.2 Nokia Translation.xlsx -- FINNISH National Authorisation (Certification) Criteria for PHR (unofficial translation into English) Contains approximately 80 criteria in 6 categories. (NATHAN BOTTS)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 '''AGENDA:'''
 *Review/Approve specific content changes
-**DKT38-39  "syncing" data and "pairing" of devices: should they be within the same section?
+**DKT4  New decision tree -- is this a good basis?
-**DKT41  decision on what to do with provenance discussion
+**DKT11  Any recommendation on a "secure coding" reference?
-**DKT42-44  new "Interoperability" section
+**DKT15  Should Usability conformance criteria be consolidated?
-**DKT50  revisit "Conditions and Agreements" and how it differs from "Informing Consumers/Users"
+**DKT32  Is automatic timeout justified as SHALL?
-**DKT57  Should Windows platform considerations be included or not?
+**DKT36-37  "syncing" data and "pairing" of devices: should they be within the same section?
+**DKT39  decision on what to do with provenance discussion
+**DKT40-42  new "Interoperability" section: should more be said?
+**DKT48  revisit "Conditions and Agreements" and how it differs from "Informing Consumers/Users"
+**DKT54  Is there a good starting point or reference for a Glossary? Should we have our own?
+**DKT55  Should Windows platform considerations be included or not?
 *San Diego September HL7 WGM considerations
 **Review preliminary cMHAFF presentation for September (San Diego) HL7 WGM