This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CG WG Call Notes leading to 2014 May WGM"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Attendees== | ==Attendees== | ||
− | * Amnon Shabo, Grant Wood, Alex Tsatsulin, Siew Lam, Scott Bolte, Rubby, Michael, Mollie | + | * Amnon Shabo, Grant Wood, Alex Tsatsulin, Siew Lam, Scott Bolte, Rubby Russel, Michael Bakhtin, Mollie Ullman-Cullere |
==Draft Minutes== | ==Draft Minutes== | ||
− | * | + | * The Power Lineage family history app was demoed by Alex |
+ | * Discussion | ||
+ | ** pain points of getting EMR vendors and healthcare providers to implement family health history structures that can be good input to risk assessment algorithms | ||
+ | ** Comparing to HL7 v3 and FHIR | ||
+ | ** Pros and cons of flat vs. hierarchical representation of the pedigree | ||
+ | * Decided to continue this discussion in the weekly call next week | ||
+ | * FHIR genomics resources are likely to be discussed in the week after |
Revision as of 16:06, 18 March 2014
March 18, 2014 -- Weekly call
Proposed Agenda
- Family health history
- Alex Tsatsulin will present and demo the Power Lineage family history app (that will be lunched at ACMG next week)
- Compare to the HL7 specs
- Discussion
Attendees
- Amnon Shabo, Grant Wood, Alex Tsatsulin, Siew Lam, Scott Bolte, Rubby Russel, Michael Bakhtin, Mollie Ullman-Cullere
Draft Minutes
- The Power Lineage family history app was demoed by Alex
- Discussion
- pain points of getting EMR vendors and healthcare providers to implement family health history structures that can be good input to risk assessment algorithms
- Comparing to HL7 v3 and FHIR
- Pros and cons of flat vs. hierarchical representation of the pedigree
- Decided to continue this discussion in the weekly call next week
- FHIR genomics resources are likely to be discussed in the week after