This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here

CDA R3 Use of Care Statement

From HL7Wiki
Revision as of 23:03, 10 May 2009 by Kboone (talk | contribs) (New page: {{CDA R3 Open Proposals}} Return to SDTC page; Return to CDA R3 Formal Proposals page. See [[:category:CDA R3 Formal Pro...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Return to SDTC page; Return to CDA R3 Formal Proposals page.

See CDA R3 Formal Proposals for instructions on using this form. Failure to adhere to these instructions may result in delays. Editing of formal proposals is restricted to the submitter and SDTC co-chairs. Other changes will be undone. Comments can be captured in the associated discussion page.


Submitted by: User:Kboone Revision date: Kboone
Submitted date: Kboone Change request ID: <<Change Request ID>>

Issue

Users of HL7 V3 standards have to decide between document and message models, and transforming from one to the other increases the barrier to entry for use of HL7 V3. The HL7 Care Record DSTU has a clinical statement model built from the Clinical Statement Model that is used in the Care Record messages. This model is very nearly identical to the CDA Clinical Statement model. To facilitate reuse of software tools used to communicate between different system, it would be ideal if the XML was identical.

Recommendation

  • Use the "Care Statement" local C-MET defined in Care Record in CDA Release 3.0.

Rationale

Use of the same models will generate identical XML, which will increase the potential for reuse across HL7 Version 3 standards.

Discussion

Recommended Action Items

Resolution

(Resolution is to be recorded here and in the referenced minutes, which are the authoritative source of resolution).