This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CDA Implementation Guide Quality Criteria"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
* Value sets | * Value sets | ||
− | ** ['''Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use'''] Are linked to templates using normative binding syntax | + | ** ['''Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use'''] Are linked to coded elements within templates using normative binding syntax |
** ['''Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use'''] Each value set is referenced via a value set OID | ** ['''Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use'''] Each value set is referenced via a value set OID | ||
** ['''Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use'''] Each code in a value set has a specified code system OID | ** ['''Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use'''] Each code in a value set has a specified code system OID | ||
− | ** SNOMED CT value sets adhere to TermInfo conformance rules | + | ** ['''Feb 14, 2013 Consider for future use'''] SNOMED CT value sets adhere to TermInfo conformance rules (as stated in the "Using SNOMED CT in HL7 Version 3" guide) |
* Examples | * Examples | ||
** Inline examples are present for all templates | ** Inline examples are present for all templates | ||
− | ** A stand alone | + | ** ['''Feb 14, 2013 Approved for use'''] A stand alone and conformant sample file is present |
* Extensions [suggested addition:Lisa Nelson] | * Extensions [suggested addition:Lisa Nelson] |
Revision as of 16:58, 14 February 2013
Return to SDWG page.
Project Scope Statement (approved by SDWG, pending TSC approval): http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=File:HL7_Project_Scope_Statement_v2012_Quality_Criteria_for_CDA_IGs.06Sept2012.docx
Timeline:
- Draft list by end of Dec 2012;
- Test the use of the list against Jan 2013 ballot;
- Finalize list by end of March 2013;
- Do some good stuff with the list after that.
Suggested CDA Implementation Guide Quality Criteria
- Title page
- [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Title is specified
- [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Version of base standard is specified (e.g. CDA R2)
- [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Realm(s) is/are specified
- [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Ballot type (e.g. DSTU, Informative, etc) is specified
- [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Date of ballot / publication is specified
- [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] HL7 International logo and copyright are present
- [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] HL7-approved title page is used and not changed (i.e. title page is approved by HQ).
- Templates
- [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Each template has a narrative description
- [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Each template has a globally unique identifier
- [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Constraints are ordered within a template per the XML ITS ordering rules
- [Jan 14, 2013 Consider for future use] Constraints should be traceable to requirements
- Version? Usage? Edition?
- [Feb 7, 2013 SDWG: In the IG Publishing subgroup queue for consideration] Guide specifies both normative and inferred or inherited constraints, but clearly differentiates between them with visual cues
- or,
- [Feb 7, 2013 SDWG: In the IG Publishing subgroup queue for consideration] Guide is published both in a concise version for normative purposes, including only constraints unique to the guide, and in a verbose version for developers, making all constraints explicit, whether unique to the guide or inherited
- Value sets
- [Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use] Are linked to coded elements within templates using normative binding syntax
- [Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use] Each value set is referenced via a value set OID
- [Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use] Each code in a value set has a specified code system OID
- [Feb 14, 2013 Consider for future use] SNOMED CT value sets adhere to TermInfo conformance rules (as stated in the "Using SNOMED CT in HL7 Version 3" guide)
- Examples
- Inline examples are present for all templates
- [Feb 14, 2013 Approved for use] A stand alone and conformant sample file is present
- Extensions [suggested addition:Lisa Nelson]
- A table summarizes all extensions
- Modified Schema including all extensions
- Validation Guidance [suggested addition:Lisa Nelson, Virinder Batra]
- A table listing the available validation mechanisms
- Guidance on how to handle situations where a document instance validates under one mechanism, but generates errors under a different recommended validation mechanism.
- Validation [suggested addition: Brett Marquard]
- Provide validation, either on a website or stand alone tool, for templates contained in an IG
- Optionally, provide the test package used to validate the tool
- Adherence to Publishing Committee guidelines [suggested addition: Bob Dolin]
- We anticipate that a CDA IG Subcommittee of the Publishing Committee will post (and continually update) CDA IG publishing criteria