This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "CDA Implementation Guide Quality Criteria"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
* Value sets
 
* Value sets
** ['''Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use'''] Are linked to templates using normative binding syntax
+
** ['''Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use'''] Are linked to coded elements within templates using normative binding syntax
 
** ['''Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use'''] Each value set is referenced via a value set OID
 
** ['''Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use'''] Each value set is referenced via a value set OID
 
** ['''Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use'''] Each code in a value set has a specified code system OID
 
** ['''Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use'''] Each code in a value set has a specified code system OID
** SNOMED CT value sets adhere to TermInfo conformance rules  
+
** ['''Feb 14, 2013 Consider for future use'''] SNOMED CT value sets adhere to TermInfo conformance rules (as stated in the "Using SNOMED CT in HL7 Version 3" guide)
  
 
* Examples
 
* Examples
 
** Inline examples are present for all templates
 
** Inline examples are present for all templates
** A stand alone complete sample file is present
+
** ['''Feb 14, 2013 Approved for use'''] A stand alone and conformant sample file is present
  
 
* Extensions [suggested addition:Lisa Nelson]
 
* Extensions [suggested addition:Lisa Nelson]

Revision as of 16:58, 14 February 2013

Return to SDWG page.


Project Scope Statement (approved by SDWG, pending TSC approval): http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=File:HL7_Project_Scope_Statement_v2012_Quality_Criteria_for_CDA_IGs.06Sept2012.docx

Timeline:

  • Draft list by end of Dec 2012;
  • Test the use of the list against Jan 2013 ballot;
  • Finalize list by end of March 2013;
  • Do some good stuff with the list after that.


Suggested CDA Implementation Guide Quality Criteria

  • Title page
    • [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Title is specified
    • [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Version of base standard is specified (e.g. CDA R2)
    • [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Realm(s) is/are specified
    • [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Ballot type (e.g. DSTU, Informative, etc) is specified
    • [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Date of ballot / publication is specified
    • [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] HL7 International logo and copyright are present
    • [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] HL7-approved title page is used and not changed (i.e. title page is approved by HQ).
  • Templates
    • [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Each template has a narrative description
    • [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Each template has a globally unique identifier
    • [Jan 14, 2013 Approved for use] Constraints are ordered within a template per the XML ITS ordering rules
    • [Jan 14, 2013 Consider for future use] Constraints should be traceable to requirements
  • Version? Usage? Edition?
    • [Feb 7, 2013 SDWG: In the IG Publishing subgroup queue for consideration] Guide specifies both normative and inferred or inherited constraints, but clearly differentiates between them with visual cues
    • or,
    • [Feb 7, 2013 SDWG: In the IG Publishing subgroup queue for consideration] Guide is published both in a concise version for normative purposes, including only constraints unique to the guide, and in a verbose version for developers, making all constraints explicit, whether unique to the guide or inherited
  • Value sets
    • [Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use] Are linked to coded elements within templates using normative binding syntax
    • [Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use] Each value set is referenced via a value set OID
    • [Feb 7, 2013 Approved for use] Each code in a value set has a specified code system OID
    • [Feb 14, 2013 Consider for future use] SNOMED CT value sets adhere to TermInfo conformance rules (as stated in the "Using SNOMED CT in HL7 Version 3" guide)
  • Examples
    • Inline examples are present for all templates
    • [Feb 14, 2013 Approved for use] A stand alone and conformant sample file is present
  • Extensions [suggested addition:Lisa Nelson]
    • A table summarizes all extensions
    • Modified Schema including all extensions
  • Validation Guidance [suggested addition:Lisa Nelson, Virinder Batra]
    • A table listing the available validation mechanisms
    • Guidance on how to handle situations where a document instance validates under one mechanism, but generates errors under a different recommended validation mechanism.
  • Validation [suggested addition: Brett Marquard]
    • Provide validation, either on a website or stand alone tool, for templates contained in an IG
    • Optionally, provide the test package used to validate the tool
  • Adherence to Publishing Committee guidelines [suggested addition: Bob Dolin]
    • We anticipate that a CDA IG Subcommittee of the Publishing Committee will post (and continually update) CDA IG publishing criteria