CCS Comments Only Ballot Reconciliation

Care Coordination Service Ballot Reconciliation

Comments Ballot - May 2013

Consolidated Excel Spreadsheet

Updated with changes from June 4th, 2013 CCS weekly meeting

Click here to view excel file: File:CCS-Consolidated-Ballot-Comments.xlsx

May 21, 2013

Attendees: Stephen Chu, Susan Campbell, Laura Heermann, Nan Hou, Emma Jones

Facilitator: Stephen Chu | Scribe: Enrique Meneses

Overview: Comment notes are captured in the uploaded consolidated ballot spreadsheet

In this meeting we did the following:

• Continued reconciliation of major negative comments from Dr. O'Malley
  • Team decided to invite him to an upcoming meeting to discuss with him remaining comments
  • Started reconciliation of minor negative comments

May 28, 2013

Attendees: Stephen Chu, Susan Campbell, Laura Heermann, Nan Hou, Emma Jones, Kevin Coonan, Russ Leftwich

Facilitator: Stephen Chu | Scribe: Enrique Meneses

Overview: Comment notes are captured in the uploaded consolidated ballot spreadsheet

In this meeting we did the following:

• Continued reconciliation of minor negative comments followed by comments submitted by Russ Leftwich on behalf of S&I LCC
  • Follow up action item: Email Bill Russell for clarification on comment #7 (structure of interventions and orders)
  • Again reemphasized we need an interaction diagram of a generic process

June 4, 2013

Attendees: Russ Leftwich, Susan Campbell, Stephen Chu, Laura Heermann, Emma Jones, Kevin Coonan

Facilitator: Stephen Chu | Scribe: Enrique Meneses

Future discussion item:

• Susan: need to capture the context of a meeting and associated activities.
  • e.g. may want to take a snapshot of the meeting and export as a CDA document
  • need to look at existing capabilities and decide what is needed for this

• Need to specify approach for dealing with governance and policies. It's out of scope for CCS but there needs to be a precise way of specifying the context required for policy evaluation.

• • What we mean by governance: A mechanism for determining agreement among care team including the patient with regards to decision authority.

• CCS will not specify capabilities for privacy, access, security and audit logging. These are general industry capabilities which should be common among the many SOA services defined by HL7. We still need to do due diligence in reviewing what we reference in the document (as it would represent a sort of "endorsement"). There exists an HSSP privacy, access and security specification which we could leverage. There are questions regarding it's alignment with the EHR FM which need to be answered. If this is to be defined by the patient care WG then there will be a separate project scope statement (and will be out of scope for CCS).

• Kevin: we need to make sure consumers understand we cannot define conformance to the SFM. The only way to specify conformance is against a technical specification (e.g. OMG phase). Agreed.

DSTU Ballot - September 2013

Placeholder