Difference between revisions of "Application Implementation and Design"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
*[[AID Activities|Description of Group Activities]]
 
*[[AID Activities|Description of Group Activities]]
 
*Agenda for the  
 
*Agenda for the  
**[[AID 201601 Meeting in Orlando|WGM in Orlando, US]] (Jan. 2016)
 
 
**[[AID 201605 Meeting in Montreal|WGM in Montreal, CA]] (May 2016)
 
**[[AID 201605 Meeting in Montreal|WGM in Montreal, CA]] (May 2016)
 
**[[AID 201606 Meeting in Genova|UGM in Genova, IT]] (June 2016)
 
**[[AID 201606 Meeting in Genova|UGM in Genova, IT]] (June 2016)
Line 20: Line 19:
 
**[[AID 201510 Meeting in Atlanta|WGM in Atlanta, US]] (Oct. 2015)
 
**[[AID 201510 Meeting in Atlanta|WGM in Atlanta, US]] (Oct. 2015)
 
**[[AID 201505 Meeting in Paris|WGM in Paris, FR]] (May 2015)
 
**[[AID 201505 Meeting in Paris|WGM in Paris, FR]] (May 2015)
**[[AID 201502 Agenda|UGM in Prague, CZ]] (Feb. 2015)
 
  
 
|valign=top|
 
|valign=top|

Revision as of 13:51, 25 January 2016

The Application Implementation and Design HL7 "User Group" (formerly known as RIMBAA, part of the FTSD) facilitates the adoption and software implementation of HL7 standards. The focus of the WG lies particularly on the use of Healthcare Standards based processable models (e.g. the version 3 RIM, FHIR and CDA) for application design and the storage of data, and to a lesser degree on the exchange and use of the data.

User Group Meetings Resources Organizational

 


Why should you participate?

  • Patrick Loyd, GPI , January 2011: "I'm involved in a lot of HL7 groups, in most of them I'm 'teaching', this is one of the few groups where I actually learn something"
  • Chirag Bhatt, CTO of FEI Systems, October 2010: "Main eye opener for me was that this workgroup demos and the discussions [are] focused on in-depth architecture/design/technology discussions with real-life implementation issues. Usually I wouldn't expect that in a meetings held for healthcare standards. However, after attending a few sessions, I am glad that this workgroup focuses on real-life issues and serves as a torch to implementers who may be lost in the "implementation darkness". I am hoping that I can engage myself more."