This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Add support for User/Account to the RIM"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) (New page: category:RIMBAA Issue ==Summary== *Various implementers of RIMBAA applications have reported a lack of support by the RIM for concepts such as '(software) user', 'account', 'user grou...) |
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[category: | + | [[category:Closed AID Issue]] |
==Summary== | ==Summary== | ||
*Various implementers of RIMBAA applications have reported a lack of support by the RIM for concepts such as '(software) user', 'account', 'user group', 'access rights'. Those things one needs to support Single Sign On (SSO) functionality. The RIM should be extended to support these concepts. | *Various implementers of RIMBAA applications have reported a lack of support by the RIM for concepts such as '(software) user', 'account', 'user group', 'access rights'. Those things one needs to support Single Sign On (SSO) functionality. The RIM should be extended to support these concepts. | ||
Latest revision as of 08:05, 25 March 2015
Summary
- Various implementers of RIMBAA applications have reported a lack of support by the RIM for concepts such as '(software) user', 'account', 'user group', 'access rights'. Those things one needs to support Single Sign On (SSO) functionality. The RIM should be extended to support these concepts.
- Workitem accepted during the 2010-01 Phoenix WGM. May have an overlap with work by the security WG.
Analysis
- If there ideas as to how the issue can be dealt with, or multiple options how things can be solved, please include them in this section.
Discussion
- Free flowing comments related to the issue at hand
