This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "AID SWOT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) m (moved RIMBAA SWOT to AID SWOT) |
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===SWOT=== | ===SWOT=== | ||
| − | Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for the | + | Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for the AID "user group" |
====Strengths==== | ====Strengths==== | ||
| − | *Active members with actual experience of | + | *Active members with actual experience of HL7 implementations |
*Active members with a passion for health information technology | *Active members with a passion for health information technology | ||
| − | *Deep understanding of | + | *Deep understanding of HL7 standards and healthcare IT implementations |
====Weaknesses==== | ====Weaknesses==== | ||
| − | *Inbalance in ability to share information due to Intellectual Property issues | + | *Inbalance in ability to share information due to Intellectual Property issues (e.g. users that are unable to share because of company IP issues) |
*Quite a few active contributors to the deliverables don't take part in WGMs (those are too much geared towards standards developers) | *Quite a few active contributors to the deliverables don't take part in WGMs (those are too much geared towards standards developers) | ||
| − | |||
====Opportunities==== | ====Opportunities==== | ||
| − | *Has the ability to show the power of | + | *Has the ability to show the power of HL7 standards |
| − | + | *Has the capability to ease implementations of HL7 standards (best practices, reference implementation) | |
| − | *Has the capability to ease implementations of | + | *Free IP, and Grassroots adoption of FHIR, will expand our audience. |
| − | * | ||
====Threats==== | ====Threats==== | ||
*Stifling effect of Intellectual Property issues | *Stifling effect of Intellectual Property issues | ||
| − | * | + | *AID not seen as an active WG because few implementers attend WGMs. |
| − | + | *Risk that commercial parties use AID as a marketing platform for tools. | |
| − | *Risk that commercial parties use | ||
Revision as of 22:08, 22 January 2014
SWOT
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for the AID "user group"
Strengths
- Active members with actual experience of HL7 implementations
- Active members with a passion for health information technology
- Deep understanding of HL7 standards and healthcare IT implementations
Weaknesses
- Inbalance in ability to share information due to Intellectual Property issues (e.g. users that are unable to share because of company IP issues)
- Quite a few active contributors to the deliverables don't take part in WGMs (those are too much geared towards standards developers)
Opportunities
- Has the ability to show the power of HL7 standards
- Has the capability to ease implementations of HL7 standards (best practices, reference implementation)
- Free IP, and Grassroots adoption of FHIR, will expand our audience.
Threats
- Stifling effect of Intellectual Property issues
- AID not seen as an active WG because few implementers attend WGMs.
- Risk that commercial parties use AID as a marketing platform for tools.
