This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "AID SWOT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) (New page: ===SWOT=== Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for the RIMBAA WG ====Strengths==== *Active members with actual experience of v3 implementations *Active members with a passi...) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
====Opportunities==== | ====Opportunities==== | ||
| − | *Has the ability to | + | *Has the ability to show the power of v3 well beyond that of "messaging" |
*Has the capability to ease implementations of v3 (best practices, reference implementation) | *Has the capability to ease implementations of v3 (best practices, reference implementation) | ||
Revision as of 19:35, 21 April 2009
SWOT
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for the RIMBAA WG
Strengths
- Active members with actual experience of v3 implementations
- Active members with a passion for technology
- Solid foundation in RIM and Methodology
Weaknesses
- Inbalance in ability to share information due to Intellectual Property issues
- Quite a few active members don't take part in WGMs (those are too much geared towards standards developers)
- Doesn't "quite fit" with most other ongoing HL7 activities
Opportunities
- Has the ability to show the power of v3 well beyond that of "messaging"
- Has the capability to ease implementations of v3 (best practices, reference implementation)
Threats
- Stifling effect of Intellectual Property issues
- "We have too much legacy stuff to care about RIMBAA" argument
