This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "2018-10-05 SGB WGM Agenda"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 81: Line 81:
 
**Value Set Governance
 
**Value Set Governance
 
**Continuous Maintenance in FHIR
 
**Continuous Maintenance in FHIR
 +
**SGB Communication Plan
 +
**Large architectures coming in:
 +
***Evaluate PSS process to potentially provide earlier visibility
 +
***How should a product family-type project be documented and reviewed - is PSS enough?
 +
***When it affects cross-organizational methodology, PFMGs need to have a review/say - potential precept
 +
**Updates that we do to newer versions of FHIR that are also applicable to older versions
 
**[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=List_of_Precepts_Under_Development '''Precepts We Need to Develop''']
 
**[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=List_of_Precepts_Under_Development '''Precepts We Need to Develop''']
 
*Parking Lot
 
*Parking Lot
 
*Mapping coordination
 
*Mapping coordination
***Add link to Confluence page from ARB page
+
**Add link to Confluence page from ARB page
 
**Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
 
**Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
 
**Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
 
**Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change

Revision as of 19:29, 12 September 2018

back to Standards Governance Board main page

HL7 SGB Minutes

Location: Lombard

Date: 2018-10-05
Time: 9:00 AM Eastern
Facilitator Paul/Lorraine Note taker(s) Anne
Attendee Name


Calvin Beebe
Lorraine Constable
Russ Hamm
Tony Julian
Paul Knapp
Ewout Kramer
Austin Kreisler
Wayne Kubick
Thom Kuhn
Ken McCaslin
Rik Smithies
Sandy Stuart
Quorum: Chair + 4

Agenda

  • Agenda review
  • Discussion Topics
    • Value Set Governance
    • Continuous Maintenance in FHIR
    • SGB Communication Plan
    • Large architectures coming in:
      • Evaluate PSS process to potentially provide earlier visibility
      • How should a product family-type project be documented and reviewed - is PSS enough?
      • When it affects cross-organizational methodology, PFMGs need to have a review/say - potential precept
    • Updates that we do to newer versions of FHIR that are also applicable to older versions
    • Precepts We Need to Develop
  • Parking Lot
  • Mapping coordination
    • Add link to Confluence page from ARB page
    • Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
    • Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
    • Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
    • Review Mission and Charter
    • Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
    • Technical Alignments Between Product Families
    • How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
    • Precept on bringing in large projects
    • Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
    • Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
    • BAM guidance on process for product adoption
    • Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
    • FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
    • Ownership of content
    • What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?

Minutes

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved