This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here

Difference between revisions of "20170606 arb minutes"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{subst::Agenda_Minutes}}")
 
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
-->
 
-->
 
=ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)=  
 
=ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)=  
{{:Spring ARB Logistics}}
+
 
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
 
#Call to order
 
#Call to order
 
#Roll Call
 
#Roll Call
#Approval of Agenda and [[YYYYMMDD_ARB_minutes | Minutes]]
+
#Approval of Agenda and [[20170530_arb_minutes | May 30, 2017 Minutes]]
 
#Management
 
#Management
##Mission and Charter Review - Due in fall WGM
 
##Decision Making Procedures review - due in fall WGM
 
 
#Governance
 
#Governance
 
#Methodology
 
#Methodology
 +
#*Joint with SGB to discuss Interoperability Specification Matrix (ISM) 
 
#Other business and planning
 
#Other business and planning
 +
#*June 13 Continue Ballot Recon
 +
#*June 20 Review Mission and Charter
 
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/ARBgeneral/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=871 Open issues]
 
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/ARBgeneral/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=871 Open issues]
 
#Adjournment
 
#Adjournment
Line 33: Line 34:
 
| width="50%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 ARB Work Group  Meeting Minutes''' <br/>
 
| width="50%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 ARB Work Group  Meeting Minutes''' <br/>
 
'''Location:  [[spring_ARB_Logistics| Telcon]]'''
 
'''Location:  [[spring_ARB_Logistics| Telcon]]'''
| width="50%" colspan="3" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Date: CCYYMMDD'''<br/> '''Time: 4:00pm U.S. Eastern'''
+
| width="50%" colspan="3" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Date: 20160606'''<br/> '''Time: 4:00pm U.S. Eastern'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator'''
 
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator'''
| width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]]/[[User:Lconstab |Constable, Lorraine]]   
+
| width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]]  
 
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)'''
 
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)'''
| width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]]//[[User:Lconstab |Constable, Lorraine]]   
+
| width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]]  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|
 
| border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|
Line 46: Line 47:
 
|colspan="2"|'''Affiliation'''  
 
|colspan="2"|'''Affiliation'''  
 
|-
 
|-
|.||Bond,Andy           
+
|X||Bond,Andy           
 
|colspan="2"|NEHTA
 
|colspan="2"|NEHTA
 
|-  
 
|-  
|.||[[User:Lconstab |Constable, Lorraine]]     
+
|R||[[User:Lconstab |Constable, Lorraine]]     
 
|colspan="2"|Constable Consulting Inc.
 
|colspan="2"|Constable Consulting Inc.
 
|-  
 
|-  
Line 55: Line 56:
 
|colspan="2"| AEGIS
 
|colspan="2"| AEGIS
 
|-
 
|-
|.||[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]]       
+
|X||[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]]       
 
|colspan="2"|Mayo Clinic
 
|colspan="2"|Mayo Clinic
 
|-  
 
|-  
|.||Knapp, Paul
+
|X||Knapp, Paul
 
|colspan="2"| Pknapp Consulting
 
|colspan="2"| Pknapp Consulting
 
|-  
 
|-  
|.||Kubick, Wayne
+
|X||Kubick, Wayne
 
|colspan="2"|HL7 CTO
 
|colspan="2"|HL7 CTO
 
|-
 
|-
Line 67: Line 68:
 
|colspan="2"| ICode Solutions
 
|colspan="2"| ICode Solutions
 
|-  
 
|-  
|.||[[User:Clynchmd | Lynch, Cecil]]       
+
|X||[[User:Clynchmd | Lynch, Cecil]]       
 
|colspan="2"|Accenture
 
|colspan="2"|Accenture
 
|-  
 
|-  
|.||Milosevic, Zoran
+
|R||Milosevic, Zoran
 
|colspan="2"|Deontik Pty Ltd
 
|colspan="2"|Deontik Pty Ltd
 
|-
 
|-
|.||[[User:Astechishin| Stechishin,Andy]]
+
|X||[[User:Astechishin| Stechishin,Andy]]
 
|colspan="2"|CANA Software and Service Ltd.
 
|colspan="2"|CANA Software and Service Ltd.
 
|-
 
|-
|colspan="4" align="center"|Guests              
+
|colspan="4" align="center"|SGB              
 
|-  
 
|-  
|.|| Nelson, Dale
+
|.|| Kreisler, Austin
|colspan="2"| Accenture
+
|colspan="2"| Leidos
 
|-
 
|-
|.||Grow, Richard
+
|.||Hamm, Russ
|colspan="2"|U.S. Department of Veterans affairs
+
|colspan="2"|IMO
 
|-
 
|-
 
|.||  
 
|.||  
Line 104: Line 105:
 
|}
 
|}
  
==Minutes==
+
#Approval of Agenda and [[20170530_arb_minutes | May 30, 2017 Minutes]]
 
+
#**Agenda approved by mutual consent
 
+
#*'''Motion''' to approve the minuts(Andy S/ Austin)
 +
#*'''Vote''' 4-0-0
 +
#Methodology
 +
#*Joint with SGB to discuss Interoperability Specification Matrix (ISM) 
 +
#**Tony presented the ISM diagram
 +
#**Discussed task - Provide guidance to groups to map their artifacts to the ISM.
 +
#**Depends on the work: If oriented for family instead of line.  Line interested in logical models, Family interested in implementation..
 +
#**Platform oriented see logical modeling as overhead with little value. 
 +
#**Product line has an interest in logical consistency within the line.
 +
#**Across HL7 there is a higher order - of which Family/Lines don't concern themselves.
 +
#**FHIR model is an abstraction, and is not implementable.  From the outside you see it as core to FHIR, in implementable view. 
 +
#**Value depends on your perspective, e.g. FHIR, CDA, V2.
 +
#**SGB is interested in the cross product family consistency, working through product families.
 +
#**SGB is concerned with lines that need consistency.
 +
#**Don't see those as lines - good things to do in order to have lines.
 +
#**Looking at a domain, what is the binding conceptual foundation, so talked about together they wont create inconsistencies. CDA, FHIR see it as an inhibitor, decided by others.
 +
#**Target audience - Product Families?  families articulate their material into the grid.
 +
#**Narrows the focus to immediate future.
 +
#**Helps to surface what is hard.
 +
#**Challenge is for domains - this is the issue they deal with, different product families across the domain.  For a family the core interest is the implementation - technical platform has been chosen.  You can grow the interest with e.g. FHIR which needs to work with other platforms. Need to reconcile a set of behaviors.
 +
#**If the logical model is  FHIR, we will take out the platform bits, and just have the information elements.
 +
#**This group needs to map one and map it, but not FHIR.
 +
#**There was a CDA exercise to do that. (Keith Boone facilitated).
 +
#**Worked on PPT.
 +
#**Next week put into the grid - may find a home, add examples, friendlier names.
 +
#Other business and planning
 +
#*June 13 Continue Ballot Recon
 +
#*June 20 Review Mission and Charter
 +
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/ARBgeneral/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=871 Open issues]
 +
#**Tony will send to Anne, for SGB consumption.
 +
#**Schedule monthly
 +
#Adjournment
  
[[Category:2017 ARB Minutes]]
+
[[Category:2017 ARB Minutes]][[Category:ARB-SGB Joint]]

Latest revision as of 20:13, 12 July 2017

ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)

Agenda

  1. Call to order
  2. Roll Call
  3. Approval of Agenda and May 30, 2017 Minutes
  4. Management
  5. Governance
  6. Methodology
    • Joint with SGB to discuss Interoperability Specification Matrix (ISM)
  7. Other business and planning
    • June 13 Continue Ballot Recon
    • June 20 Review Mission and Charter
    • Open issues
  8. Adjournment

Meeting Information

HL7 ARB Work Group Meeting Minutes

Location: Telcon

Date: 20160606
Time: 4:00pm U.S. Eastern
Facilitator Julian, Tony Note taker(s) Julian, Tony
Attendee Name Affiliation
X Bond,Andy NEHTA
R Constable, Lorraine Constable Consulting Inc.
. Hyland, Mario AEGIS
X Julian, Tony Mayo Clinic
X Knapp, Paul Pknapp Consulting
X Kubick, Wayne HL7 CTO
. Loyd, Patrick ICode Solutions
X Lynch, Cecil Accenture
R Milosevic, Zoran Deontik Pty Ltd
X Stechishin,Andy CANA Software and Service Ltd.
SGB
. Kreisler, Austin Leidos
. Hamm, Russ IMO
.
Legend
X Present
. Absent
R Regrets
Quorum Requirements (Co-chair + 3) Met: Yes
  1. Approval of Agenda and May 30, 2017 Minutes
      • Agenda approved by mutual consent
    • Motion to approve the minuts(Andy S/ Austin)
    • Vote 4-0-0
  2. Methodology
    • Joint with SGB to discuss Interoperability Specification Matrix (ISM)
      • Tony presented the ISM diagram
      • Discussed task - Provide guidance to groups to map their artifacts to the ISM.
      • Depends on the work: If oriented for family instead of line. Line interested in logical models, Family interested in implementation..
      • Platform oriented see logical modeling as overhead with little value.
      • Product line has an interest in logical consistency within the line.
      • Across HL7 there is a higher order - of which Family/Lines don't concern themselves.
      • FHIR model is an abstraction, and is not implementable. From the outside you see it as core to FHIR, in implementable view.
      • Value depends on your perspective, e.g. FHIR, CDA, V2.
      • SGB is interested in the cross product family consistency, working through product families.
      • SGB is concerned with lines that need consistency.
      • Don't see those as lines - good things to do in order to have lines.
      • Looking at a domain, what is the binding conceptual foundation, so talked about together they wont create inconsistencies. CDA, FHIR see it as an inhibitor, decided by others.
      • Target audience - Product Families? families articulate their material into the grid.
      • Narrows the focus to immediate future.
      • Helps to surface what is hard.
      • Challenge is for domains - this is the issue they deal with, different product families across the domain. For a family the core interest is the implementation - technical platform has been chosen. You can grow the interest with e.g. FHIR which needs to work with other platforms. Need to reconcile a set of behaviors.
      • If the logical model is FHIR, we will take out the platform bits, and just have the information elements.
      • This group needs to map one and map it, but not FHIR.
      • There was a CDA exercise to do that. (Keith Boone facilitated).
      • Worked on PPT.
      • Next week put into the grid - may find a home, add examples, friendlier names.
  3. Other business and planning
    • June 13 Continue Ballot Recon
    • June 20 Review Mission and Charter
    • Open issues
      • Tony will send to Anne, for SGB consumption.
      • Schedule monthly
  4. Adjournment