This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
2017-03-08 SGB Conference Call
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
back to Standards Governance Board main page
| HL7 SGB Minutes |
Date: 2016-03-08 Time: 10:00 AM Eastern | ||
| Facilitator | Paul/Calvin | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee | Name
| ||
| Calvin Beebe | |||
| Lorraine Constable | |||
| Russ Hamm | |||
| Tony Julian | |||
| Paul Knapp | |||
| Austin Kreisler | |||
| Wayne Kubick | |||
| Mary Kay McDaniel | |||
| Ken McCaslin | |||
| Rik Smithies | |||
| Quorum: Chair + 4 | |||
Agenda
- Agenda review
- Review Minutes of 2017-03-01 SGB_Conference_Call
- Action Items
- SGB to send definition of Substantive Change to methodology groups for review
- ARB to follow up with PSS approvals for subst. change project
- Austin will go through the Project Services' "Introducing New Processes" document and report back
- Austin and Calvin will look at ANSI requirements and Essential Requirements and come up with a draft for an additional type of ballot comment disposition. Tentative schedule for 3/15. Anne to invite Karen.
- Send request for FMG lunch time to discuss mixed content in ballot
- Discuss issue with Grahame beforehand
- Anne to go back and ask for clarification on what SUR means in the Privacy Cookbook and have them define in document before we complete further assessment.
- Response from Richard Grow: Good question. SUR (Specification Under Review) is a term used by W3C, but I can’t find a definition from them. One of the negative voters on the ballot recommended that I use “SUR,” and I obliged. However, I would have no objection to replacing “SUR” with the term that HL7 uses for standards or specifications under development.
- SGB to send definition of Substantive Change to methodology groups for review
- Discussion Topics
- Final Decisions on transitions in ballot level
- SGB provider role recruitment
- Review of position descriptions for FMG/FGB
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Mixed ballot content issue
- Parking Lot
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Vocabulary precepts
- General precepts
- Precept around training WGs in CDA methodology and management principles
- Levels of standards
- Separation of concerns
- Ownership of content
- ISM
- Ownership of content
- Differentiation of groups that develop standards and those that don't
Minutes
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2017 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
