This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "2016 ARB Baltimore WGM"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 33: Line 33:
 
==Report of Decisions made last cycle==
 
==Report of Decisions made last cycle==
 
#Decisions:
 
#Decisions:
−
#*20160531:
+
#*[[20160531_arb_minutes | May 31, 2016]]
−
##*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/arbgeneral/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FHL7%2520Project%2520Scope%2520Statement%2520v2015.1_CIMI_POC_d20160511.docx CIMI Proof of concept]
+
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/arbgeneral/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FHL7%2520Project%2520Scope%2520Statement%2520v2015.1_CIMI_POC_d20160511.docx CIMI Proof of concept]
−
##**'''Motion''' ARB be co-sponsor of the project, with periodic reports on progress what they are doing and where they are going.
+
#**'''Motion''' ARB be co-sponsor of the project, with periodic reports on progress what they are doing and where they are going.
−
##**Zoran: On this PSS only?  Need to clarify "• Demonstrate relationship between information models and logically computable expressions"
+
#**Zoran: On this PSS only?  Need to clarify "• Demonstrate relationship between information models and logically computable expressions"
−
##**'''Motion to table'''  (Paul/Lorraine)
+
#**'''Motion to table'''  (Paul/Lorraine)
−
##**'''Vote'''' 7-0-0   
+
#**'''Vote'''' 7-0-0   
−
#*20160607:
+
#*[[20160607_arb_minutes | June 7, 2016]]
−
##*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/arbgeneral/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FHL7%2520Project%2520Scope%2520Statement%2520v2015.1_CIMI_POC_d20160511.docx CIMI Proof of concept]
+
#**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/arbgeneral/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FHL7%2520Project%2520Scope%2520Statement%2520v2015.1_CIMI_POC_d20160511.docx CIMI Proof of concept]
−
##**'''Motion''' ARB be co-sponsor of the project, with periodic reports on progress what they are doing and where they are going.  To develop a better understanding how the CIMI artifacts integrate with the current products and families. (Lorraine/Paul)
+
#***'''Motion''' ARB be co-sponsor of the project, with periodic reports on progress what they are doing and where they are going.  To develop a better understanding how the CIMI artifacts integrate with the current products and families. (Lorraine/Paul)
−
##**Andy B: Need to look at how we integrate new work groups - need to discuss with TSC, PLA, and PIC.
+
#***Andy B: Need to look at how we integrate new work groups - need to discuss with TSC, PLA, and PIC.
−
##**'''Vote''' (4-0-0)
+
#***'''Vote''' (4-0-0)
−
#*20160614:
+
#*[[20160614_arb_minutes | June 14, 2016]],[[20160621_arb_minutes|June 21, 2016]],[[20160628_arb_minutes | June 28, 2016]],[[20160705_arb_minutes|July 5, 2016]]
−
##*Discussed the ISM
+
#**Discussed the ISM
−
#*20160621:
+
#**Prepared ISM PPT
−
##*Discussed the ISM
+
#*[[20160712_arb_minutes |July 12, 2016]]
−
#*20160628:
+
#**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/10255/14474/HL7%20Project%20Scope%20Statement%20v2016_OO_NBS_5-24-16_postOOPHERUSRSC%202.docx Project Approval Request] by the OO WG of the SSD-SD of Newborn Screening Lab Result Implementation Guide at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=1267 Project Insight 1267] and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=10255&start=0 TSC Tracker 10255]
−
##*Discussed the ISM
+
#*** '''Motion''' to approve(Lorraine/Wayne).
−
#*20160705:
+
#*** '''Vote''' (4-0-0)
−
##Discussed the ISM
+
#**ISM Review
−
##*Prepared PPT
+
#**Developed ISM presentation.
−
#*20160712:
+
#*[[20160719_arb_minutes | July 19,2016]]
−
##**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/10255/14474/HL7%20Project%20Scope%20Statement%20v2016_OO_NBS_5-24-16_postOOPHERUSRSC%202.docx Project Approval Request] by the OO WG of the SSD-SD of Newborn Screening Lab Result Implementation Guide at [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=1267 Project Insight 1267] and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/tsc/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=10255&start=0 TSC Tracker 10255]
+
#**Refined ISM
−
##** '''Motion''' to approve(Lorraine/Wayne).
+
#*[[20160726_arb_minutes | July 26, 2016]]
−
##** '''Vote''' (4-0-0)
+
#**[http://gforge.hl7.org/svn/arbgeneral/trunk/HL7%20PSS-Immunization%20Functional%20Profile-20160628.docx EHR Immunization Functional Profile]
−
##*ISM Review
+
#***'''Motion''' To approve on behalf of the ARB (Lorraine/Patrick)
−
##** Developed ISM presentation.
+
#***'''Vote''' 6-0-0  
−
#*20160719:
+
#*[[20160802_arb_minutes | August 2, 2016]]
−
##* Refined ISM
+
#**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/10402/14554/HL7%20Project%20Scope%20Statement_DAF_2016_PSS_v4%207.docx DAF Pss external content]
−
#*20160726:
+
#***DAF should belong to another committee.
−
##*[http://gforge.hl7.org/svn/arbgeneral/trunk/HL7%20PSS-Immunization%20Functional%20Profile-20160628.docx EHR Immunization Functional Profile]
+
#***'''Motion''' Arb agrees that the external content is appropriate. (Wayne/Paul)
−
##*'''Motion''' To approve on behalf of the ARB (Lorraine/Patrick)
+
#***'''Vote''' 3-0-0  
−
##*'''Vote''' 6-0-0  
+
#*[[20160816_arb_minutes| August 16, 2016]]
−
#*20160802:
+
#**ARB suggested the following draft definition for “Guidance” Product Type: - Tony
−
##*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/10402/14554/HL7%20Project%20Scope%20Statement_DAF_2016_PSS_v4%207.docx DAF Pss external content]
+
#***A Guidance is a type of informative document that describes principles, best practices, and general advice but is not directly related to implementation of one or more specifications.
−
##**DAF should belong to another committee.
+
#****MOTION to accept definition: Tony/Andy
−
##**'''Motion''' Arb agrees that the external content is appropriate. (Wayne/Paul)
+
#****Discussion: Calvin asks if it's a sense that the definition precludes referencing any implementations or complete implementations? Tony: the idea is that it's not an implementation guide. Calvin: Could a guidance document apply to the writing of the standard? Or how you implement an aspect of a standard? Decision that these aspects don't change the definition. Discussion over whether past products would fall under this type.
−
##**'''Vote''' 3-0-0  
+
#****MOTION to table the motion until next week: Lorraine/Paul
−
#*20160830:
+
#*[[20160823_arb_minutes | August 23, 2016]]
−
###[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/arbgeneral/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FMission_charter.docx Mission and Charter Review]
+
#**Reviewed Mission and charter
−
##Methodology
+
#**Review Technical Architecture
−
##*Definition of "Guidance" product
+
#*[[20160830_arb_minutes | August 30, 2016]]
−
#A Guidance is a type of informative document that describes principles, best practices, and general advice but is not directly related to implementation of one or more specifications.
+
#**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/arbgeneral/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FMission_charter.docx Mission and Charter Review]
−
#MOTION to accept definition: Tony/Andy
+
#**Definition of "Guidance" product
−
#Discussion: Calvin asks if it's a sense that the definition precludes referencing any implementations or complete implementations? Tony: the idea is that it's not an implementation guide. Calvin: Could a guidance document apply to the writing of the standard? Or how you implement an aspect of a standard? Decision that these aspects don't change the definition. Discussion over whether past products would fall under this type.
+
#***A Guidance is a type of informative document that describes principles, best practices, and general advice but is not directly related to implementation of one or more specifications.
−
#*20160906:
+
#**MOTION to accept definition: Tony/Andy
−
##*'''Definition:'''
+
#**Discussion: Calvin asks if it's a sense that the definition precludes referencing any implementations or complete implementations? Tony: the idea is that it's not an implementation guide. Calvin: Could a guidance document apply to the writing of the standard? Or how you implement an aspect of a standard? Decision that these aspects don't change the definition. Discussion over whether past products would fall under this type.
−
##**A Guidance document is a type of informative document that describes principles, best practices, and general advice but is not sufficient to achieve the conformant implementation of one or more standards.
+
#**Tabled due to exhaustion
−
##**'''Motion to accept the above'''(Andy S/Lorraine)
+
#*[[20160906_arb_minutes | September 6, 2016]]
−
##**'''Vote''' (5-0-0)
+
#*'''Guidance Document Definition:'''
−
#*20160913:
+
#**A Guidance document is a type of informative document that describes principles, best practices, and general advice but is not sufficient to achieve the conformant implementation of one or more standards.
−
##*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/arbgeneral/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FHL7%2520Project%2520Scope%2520Statement%2520v2016_template_with_instructions%2520IZ.docx Immunization PSS referred by USRSC]
+
#***'''Motion to accept the above'''(Andy S/Lorraine)
−
##**'''Motion'''ARB has reviewed the external content and are happy with the processes in place.(Lorraine/Wayne)
+
#***'''Vote''' (5-0-0)
−
##**'''Vote''' ( 8 - 0 -0 )
+
#*[[20160913_arb_minutes | September 13, 2016]]
 +
#**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/arbgeneral/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FHL7%2520Project%2520Scope%2520Statement%2520v2016_template_with_instructions%2520IZ.docx Immunization PSS referred by USRSC]
 +
#***'''Motion'''ARB has reviewed the external content and are happy with the processes in place.(Lorraine/Wayne)
 +
#***'''Vote''' (8-0-0)
 +
==Works in progress==
 +
#Mission and Charter
 +
#*Review after discussing goals
 +
#Decision Making practices
 +
#*Second vote as required by the DMP for revisions
 +
#Substantivity
 +
#*(Frieda)Follow up for this agenda item:  "Substantivity PSS - update?"  We didn't know if ARB had completed definition of Substantivity.
 +
#**This is URL to the ARB project, which is still open:  http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/arb/projects.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=1259
 +
#BAM
 +
#*Where do we go from here?
 +
#*We started sunset, were going to review with PIC, but circumstances overcame

Revision as of 17:44, 14 September 2016

DRAFT - this agenda will be finalized on teleconferences

Agenda Sunday Q4 Joint with SGB

  1. Call to order
  2. Roll Call
  3. Approval of Agenda and Minutes
  4. Management
  5. Governance
  6. Methodology (60 minutes)
  7. Other business and planning
  8. Adjournment

Agenda Thursday Q3

  1. Call to order
  2. Roll Call
  3. Approval of Agenda and September 13, 2016 Minutes
  4. Management
  5. Governance
  6. Methodology (60 minutes)
  7. Other business and planning
  8. Adjournment

Report of Decisions made last cycle

  1. Decisions:
    • May 31, 2016
    • CIMI Proof of concept
      • Motion ARB be co-sponsor of the project, with periodic reports on progress what they are doing and where they are going.
      • Zoran: On this PSS only? Need to clarify "• Demonstrate relationship between information models and logically computable expressions"
      • Motion to table (Paul/Lorraine)
      • Vote' 7-0-0
    • June 7, 2016
      • CIMI Proof of concept
        • Motion ARB be co-sponsor of the project, with periodic reports on progress what they are doing and where they are going. To develop a better understanding how the CIMI artifacts integrate with the current products and families. (Lorraine/Paul)
        • Andy B: Need to look at how we integrate new work groups - need to discuss with TSC, PLA, and PIC.
        • Vote (4-0-0)
    • June 14, 2016,June 21, 2016, June 28, 2016,July 5, 2016
      • Discussed the ISM
      • Prepared ISM PPT
    • July 12, 2016
    • July 19,2016
      • Refined ISM
    • July 26, 2016
    • August 2, 2016
      • DAF Pss external content
        • DAF should belong to another committee.
        • Motion Arb agrees that the external content is appropriate. (Wayne/Paul)
        • Vote 3-0-0
    • August 16, 2016
      • ARB suggested the following draft definition for “Guidance” Product Type: - Tony
        • A Guidance is a type of informative document that describes principles, best practices, and general advice but is not directly related to implementation of one or more specifications.
          • MOTION to accept definition: Tony/Andy
          • Discussion: Calvin asks if it's a sense that the definition precludes referencing any implementations or complete implementations? Tony: the idea is that it's not an implementation guide. Calvin: Could a guidance document apply to the writing of the standard? Or how you implement an aspect of a standard? Decision that these aspects don't change the definition. Discussion over whether past products would fall under this type.
          • MOTION to table the motion until next week: Lorraine/Paul
    • August 23, 2016
      • Reviewed Mission and charter
      • Review Technical Architecture
    • August 30, 2016
      • Mission and Charter Review
      • Definition of "Guidance" product
        • A Guidance is a type of informative document that describes principles, best practices, and general advice but is not directly related to implementation of one or more specifications.
      • MOTION to accept definition: Tony/Andy
      • Discussion: Calvin asks if it's a sense that the definition precludes referencing any implementations or complete implementations? Tony: the idea is that it's not an implementation guide. Calvin: Could a guidance document apply to the writing of the standard? Or how you implement an aspect of a standard? Decision that these aspects don't change the definition. Discussion over whether past products would fall under this type.
      • Tabled due to exhaustion
    • September 6, 2016
    • Guidance Document Definition:
      • A Guidance document is a type of informative document that describes principles, best practices, and general advice but is not sufficient to achieve the conformant implementation of one or more standards.
        • Motion to accept the above(Andy S/Lorraine)
        • Vote (5-0-0)
    • September 13, 2016

Works in progress

  1. Mission and Charter
    • Review after discussing goals
  2. Decision Making practices
    • Second vote as required by the DMP for revisions
  3. Substantivity
  4. BAM
    • Where do we go from here?
    • We started sunset, were going to review with PIC, but circumstances overcame
Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=2016_ARB_Baltimore_WGM&oldid=125638"