This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2016-10-19 Working Meeting"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
= Agenda = | = Agenda = | ||
* Review minutes from [[2016-09-07 Working Meeting | September 7]] meeting | * Review minutes from [[2016-09-07 Working Meeting | September 7]] meeting | ||
| + | |||
| + | Action Items: | ||
| + | * Timeline for publication: | ||
| + | ** Diana to submit NIB (Due Oct 30)(Diana sending out the draft NIB to SOA, CBCC, and Security WGs) | ||
| + | ** 1st draft due Nov 7 (Diana to send first draft to Lynn) | ||
| + | ** Voting starts Dec 9 | ||
| + | * Task list: | ||
| + | ** Diana finish updates (in progress) | ||
| + | ** New use case written (Need to set up a meeting with Mike) | ||
| + | ** Insert Audit FM requirements (Awaiting discussion) | ||
| + | ***Dave S. to send most recent version to Diana (Done) | ||
| + | ** Include Mark Underwood's disclosure scenarios? Dave Pyke to read through scenarios to determine applicability. | ||
| + | |||
* Discuss updates | * Discuss updates | ||
* Discuss where to put FM. | * Discuss where to put FM. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 40: | ||
==Meeting summary== | ==Meeting summary== | ||
| − | Action | + | Action Items: |
| − | * Diana to submit NIB (Due Oct 30) | + | * Timeline for publication: |
| − | * 1st draft due Nov 7 (Diana to send first draft to Lynn) | + | ** Diana to submit NIB (Due Oct 30)(Diana sending out the draft NIB to SOA, CBCC, and Security WGs) |
| − | * Voting starts Dec 9 | + | ** 1st draft due Nov 7 (Diana to send first draft to Lynn) |
| + | ** Voting starts Dec 9 | ||
* Task list: | * Task list: | ||
| − | ** Diana finish updates | + | ** Diana finish updates (in progress) |
| − | ** New use case written | + | ** New use case written (Need to set up a meeting with Mike) |
| − | ** Insert Audit FM requirements | + | ** Insert Audit FM requirements (Awaiting discussion) |
| − | ***Dave S. to send most recent version to Diana | + | ***Dave S. to send most recent version to Diana (Done) |
| − | |||
** Include Mark Underwood's disclosure scenarios? Dave Pyke to read through scenarios to determine applicability. | ** Include Mark Underwood's disclosure scenarios? Dave Pyke to read through scenarios to determine applicability. | ||
| + | ______ | ||
| + | * Discuss updates - We looked at comments 38 & 39 and answered questions that Diana had wrt roles and dependencies on the Idealized Disclosure Record tables. A question arose regarding how "Source" and "Destination" are roles. Dave Pike agreed to pass this question on to Pat P. | ||
| + | * Discuss where to put FM - In PASS ACS, we put the functional model in the Business Viewpoint. In looking at the description of the different viewpoints, Dave Silver suggested that the Engineering Viewpoint Platform Independent Model section might make sense from its description but, given that PASS ACS has a FM in the Business Viewpoint section, it might make sense to put in a PIM section in the Business Viewpoint. The question is, why was no PIM or Platform Specific section put into the Business Viewpoint before? This may also be an appropriate question for Pat or one of the other original authors. | ||
[[Category:PASS_Audit_Working_Meeting_Minutes]] | [[Category:PASS_Audit_Working_Meeting_Minutes]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:17, 20 October 2016
Back to main PASS Audit Services page.
Agenda
- Review minutes from September 7 meeting
Action Items:
- Timeline for publication:
- Diana to submit NIB (Due Oct 30)(Diana sending out the draft NIB to SOA, CBCC, and Security WGs)
- 1st draft due Nov 7 (Diana to send first draft to Lynn)
- Voting starts Dec 9
- Task list:
- Diana finish updates (in progress)
- New use case written (Need to set up a meeting with Mike)
- Insert Audit FM requirements (Awaiting discussion)
- Dave S. to send most recent version to Diana (Done)
- Include Mark Underwood's disclosure scenarios? Dave Pyke to read through scenarios to determine applicability.
- Discuss updates
- Discuss where to put FM.
Minutes
Attendees
| Member | Present | Member | Present |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diana Proud-Madruga- SOA co-chair | x | Andrea Christenot | |
| David Silver | x | Dave Pyke | x |
| Ken Salyards | Doug Timpe | ||
| Suzanne Gonzales-Webb | Beth Pumo | ||
| Mike Davis | Mark Underwood | ||
| Richard Ettema | Mario Hyland | ||
| Kevan Riley | Chris Shawn |
Meeting summary
Action Items:
- Timeline for publication:
- Diana to submit NIB (Due Oct 30)(Diana sending out the draft NIB to SOA, CBCC, and Security WGs)
- 1st draft due Nov 7 (Diana to send first draft to Lynn)
- Voting starts Dec 9
- Task list:
- Diana finish updates (in progress)
- New use case written (Need to set up a meeting with Mike)
- Insert Audit FM requirements (Awaiting discussion)
- Dave S. to send most recent version to Diana (Done)
- Include Mark Underwood's disclosure scenarios? Dave Pyke to read through scenarios to determine applicability.
______
- Discuss updates - We looked at comments 38 & 39 and answered questions that Diana had wrt roles and dependencies on the Idealized Disclosure Record tables. A question arose regarding how "Source" and "Destination" are roles. Dave Pike agreed to pass this question on to Pat P.
- Discuss where to put FM - In PASS ACS, we put the functional model in the Business Viewpoint. In looking at the description of the different viewpoints, Dave Silver suggested that the Engineering Viewpoint Platform Independent Model section might make sense from its description but, given that PASS ACS has a FM in the Business Viewpoint section, it might make sense to put in a PIM section in the Business Viewpoint. The question is, why was no PIM or Platform Specific section put into the Business Viewpoint before? This may also be an appropriate question for Pat or one of the other original authors.
