This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20150916 FMG concall"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
***Grahame will send out same call on implementers list. | ***Grahame will send out same call on implementers list. | ||
*Discussion Topics | *Discussion Topics | ||
| + | **FMM5 calls for inclusion of the artifact in two formal publication release cycles. | ||
| + | ***Does that mean that the content has to have been DSTU in both versions or whether it's ok for it to be draft. | ||
| + | ***Do the cycles need to be consecutive - I.e. can something be in one release, yanked for a release (or dropped to a lower status), then put back for a release and still meet the criterion? | ||
**How to we add the review of profiles against resources by the WGs responsible for those resources into the timeline process | **How to we add the review of profiles against resources by the WGs responsible for those resources into the timeline process | ||
**Policy around FHIR-related project proposals that go to TSC without FMG approval | **Policy around FHIR-related project proposals that go to TSC without FMG approval | ||
Revision as of 15:50, 16 September 2015
| HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes Location: |
Date: 2015-09-16 Time: 4:00 PM U.S. Eastern | |
| Chair: | Note taker(s): Anne W. | |
| Quorum = chair + 4 | yes/no | |||||
| Co chairs | David Hay | Lloyd McKenzie | ||||
| ex-officio | Woody Beeler, Dave Shaver FGB Co-chairs |
. | John Quinn, CTO | |||
| Members | Members | Members | Observers/Guests | ||||
| Hans Buitendijk | Brian Postlethwaite | Paul Knapp | Anne W., scribe | ||||
| Josh Mandel | John Moehrke | Brian Pech | |||||
| . | |||||||
Agenda
- Roll Call
- Agenda Check
- Minutes from 20150909_FMG_concall
- Administrative
- Action items
- Lloyd to review DSTU 2 QA page for completeness against the QA spreadsheet
- Lloyd will send out email to WGs reminding them that 1) if they have outstanding warnings, they've got 4 or 5 days left to get those clear or be dropped to draft and 2) look at QA checklist and, if aiming for level 4 or higher, make sure scopes tab is complete. Will also send out appeal to those in production to let us know what resources they are using.
- Grahame will send out same call on implementers list.
- Action items
- Discussion Topics
- FMM5 calls for inclusion of the artifact in two formal publication release cycles.
- Does that mean that the content has to have been DSTU in both versions or whether it's ok for it to be draft.
- Do the cycles need to be consecutive - I.e. can something be in one release, yanked for a release (or dropped to a lower status), then put back for a release and still meet the criterion?
- How to we add the review of profiles against resources by the WGs responsible for those resources into the timeline process
- Policy around FHIR-related project proposals that go to TSC without FMG approval
- Will the FMG be an interested party/cosponsor of the ArB project to map FHIR specs to the RIM? Should FIWG be leading the project?
- Where will the new implementer's channel be located; will it be affiliated with FHIR.org; will it be run by someone separate from HL7 or will HL7 run it?
- FMM5 calls for inclusion of the artifact in two formal publication release cycles.
- Reports
- Connectathon management (David/Brian)
- FGB –
- MnM –
- FMG Liaisons –
- Process management
- Ballot Planning
- Ballot content review and QA process FHIR QA Guidelines
- AOB (Any Other Business)
Minutes
Next Steps
| Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) | |||
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
Back to FHIR_Management_Group
© 2015 Health Level Seven® International
