logistics

There is NO DAF reconciliation planned for February 8, so no GTM

If we are doing DAF reconciliation:
- GTM https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/306592429
- Use the phone line for audio

Agenda

Mead presented the issue as outlined on gforge tracker
Freida Hall added some points
Mead's motion: "XAD.8 use as city limit indicator is consistent with usage within an implementation guide."; second by Brett
Discussion re: choices; Dave concerned with usage is it feels 'odd'. No better slot suggested
Dave requested that Mead submit 2.10 proposal to modify description of XAD.8 to describe this use of the component; Mead agreed.
Carries 4-0-2

Freida provided description. Extending the P/D/T table to include "V" for validation, "N" for non-production
Additional clarification regarding "D", "P", and "T" usage
Fredia's description on the co-chair's list: "OO has approved a proposal to add new values to HL7 Table 0103, hopefully in V2.9. The original proposal was to add a single value “V-Validation”, however, in the course of discussion, OO also identified revisions to the definition of MSH-11 Processing ID and the associated PT (Processing Type) data type, and an additional table value and clarifications. Details are in the attached Harmonization Proposal; this is using the new form from the Vocabulary Work Group distributed by Ted Klein. The V2 database proposal #is 844 . (OO Co-chairs, this is on the OO wiki as OO CR 187-844)"
- http://www.hl7.org/memonly/dbtracker/display_detail.cfm?trackerid=844
- http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=OO_CR187-844_Add_values_Table_103
Mark moves to take this to Harmonization; Freida seconds
Carries 6-0-0