This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here

20140625 FMG concall

From HL7Wiki
Revision as of 18:09, 25 June 2014 by David hay (talk | contribs) (Created page with " Minutes Started 5:30 NZ Time Present * Paul Knapp * Hugh Glover * John Moerhke * Ken McCaslin * Hans * Josh Mandel Reviewing the document re registries * paul – som...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search



Minutes

Started 5:30 NZ Time

Present

  • Paul Knapp
  • Hugh Glover
  • John Moerhke
  • Ken McCaslin
  • Hans
  • Josh Mandel


Reviewing the document re registries

  • paul – some FMG, some others eg tooling / ES
  • paul – concerns with charging – note that everything related to FHIR should be free
  • ken does that apply to FHIR?
  • hugh document suggests free to all but different service models
  • paul what does service level mean? Function or timeliness
  • hugh – service model for scale eg free is 20x day
  • david ? push on to vendor to suggest
    • hugh - a strategic level – need principles – viewpoint may differ
    • principles established by FGB/ TSC
  • list of registries:
    • JM why security event / subscription
      • queried by functionality but not a registry as such
      • PK – may be viewable / support
    • suggest re-ordering
      • profile, namespace, valueset, conformance, conceptmap ,data element
    • dh any missing registries?
      • none noted
  • general review of doc
    • business case – hl7 developed – may need to review approval processes for HL7 developed
    • should there be both HL7 developed and individually developed artifacts in the same registry
      • advantages in a single registry, but costs / processs involved + opportunities for revenue etc.
        • who should curate? Would other organizations want HL7 to curate
  • paul is there sufficient detail in document to involve other working groups?
    • yes - action noted

Meeting finished 6.04 (NZ time)

actions

  • LM why include event / subscription registries?
    • suggest re-ordering or registries
    • profile, namespace, valueset, conformance, conceptmap ,data element
  • DH - reach out to FGB, Tooling, ES to start their review. Questions raised so far:
    • FGB – consider financial principle of registry
    • should there be both HL7 developed and individually developed artifacts in the same registry