20140625 FMG concall

HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes Location: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/279790597 (voice and screen)		Date: 2014-mm-dd Time: 1:00 PM U.S. Eastern
Chair: Lloyd		Note taker(s): David

Quorum = chair + 4			yes/no
Co chairs	x	David Hay	x	Lloyd McKenzie
ex-officio		Woody Beeler, Dave Shaver FGB Co-chairs	.	John Quinn, CTO

Agenda

Roll Call
Agenda Check
Minutes from 20140618_FMG_concall
Administrative
- Action items
  - Andy will take a look at the security fix on the objective C reference implementation (Lloyd)
  - David will check with those that supplied the javascript code as well as with the server side javascript problems in the DSTU build to ensure it has the security fix.
  - Liaison responsibility review/ transfer from Lorraine (Hans
  - check that RP’s for current proposal have correct owner and approve as block. (David)
  - Policy statement on pre-DSTU draft for comment ballot rounds for development materials (Lloyd)
  - LM – update requirements for registry
  - Create RFP draft for registry
    - (include curation mechanism)
  - Tooling/ES to draft requirements for registry also
Reports
- Connectathon management (David/Brian)
- FGB –
- MnM –
- FMG Liaisons –
Process management
- Ballot Planning
- Ballot content review and QA process FHIR QA Guidelines
AOB (Any Other Business)

Started 5:30 NZ Time

Reviewing the document re registries

paul – some FMG, some others eg tooling / ES
paul – concerns with charging – note that everything related to FHIR should be free
ken does that apply to FHIR?
hugh document suggests free to all but different service models
paul what does service level mean? Function or timeliness
hugh – service model for scale eg free is 20x day
david ? push on to vendor to suggest
- hugh - a strategic level – need principles – viewpoint may differ
- principles established by FGB/ TSC
list of registries:
- JM why security event / subscription
  - queried by functionality but not a registry as such
  - PK – may be viewable / support
- suggest re-ordering
  - profile, namespace, valueset, conformance, conceptmap ,data element
- dh any missing registries?
  - none noted
general review of doc
- business case – hl7 developed – may need to review approval processes for HL7 developed
- should there be both HL7 developed and individually developed artifacts in the same registry
  - advantages in a single registry, but costs / processs involved + opportunities for revenue etc.
    - who should curate? Would other organizations want HL7 to curate

paul is there sufficient detail in document to involve other working groups?
- yes - action noted

Meeting finished 6.04 (NZ time)

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)

LM why include event / subscription registries?
- suggest re-ordering or registries
- profile, namespace, valueset, conformance, conceptmap ,data element

DH - reach out to FGB, Tooling, ES to start their review. Questions raised so far:
- FGB – consider financial principle of registry
- should there be both HL7 developed and individually developed artifacts in the same registry

Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

20140702 FMG concall