This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

20130918 BAM Modeling

From HL7Wiki
Revision as of 18:34, 18 September 2013 by Llaakso (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TSC representatives and ArB to jointly develop content for the BAM for the Product Line Architecture Program

HL7 BAM Modeling Call Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
GTM 111-567-781

Date: 2013-09-18
Time: 2 pm Eastern Time
Facilitator Austin Kreisler Note taker(s) Lynn
Attendee Name


x Calvin Beebe
Woody Beeler
Jane Curry
Bo Dagnall
Jean Duteau,
Tony Julian
x Austin Kreisler,
x Lynn Laakso
Cecil Lynch
x Ron Parker
x Brian Pech
Melva Peters
no quorum definition

Agenda

  • Agenda
    • WGM agenda for Weds Q3
    • Other planning for WGM
    • PSS development for CDA R2 (R3?) IG Product Family.
    • Continue discussion on model diagram


Minutes

  • Agenda
  • BAM-lite - from ArB. Formalizing product focus, conceptual/logical/physical, traceable business requirements. Instead of formalizing the whole life cycle, just narrate the first three stages. They have most of the first two phases and almost ready for the third phase. They hope to turn it around within a month of the WGM.
    • Changes to membership model making such a moving target. Trying to get it on the Board agenda will be difficult. They can ask for ½ hour on an upcoming call.
    • Need to also review so many changes with membership with an eye to vitality triggers
    • SDC issues of concern and need to think about using a content review team for any external work brought in before acceptance of a project. This was an original function of the ArB and ArB may need to have additional people added to help perform that task. Otherwise they may have to convene a panel of experts for the review if they experts don't have position on the ArB. Role of triggers , vitality assessment, and explicit risk assessment discussed.
    • Need to have a process for a "sniff test" to recognize an external contribution's product family and may refer to ArB. Criteria on such contributions doesn't really exist. Brian notes that the HL7 domain and reach may have some concrete definitions.
    • SDC will be discussed on today's US Realm call and will likely be required to adopt ISO Datatypes.
    • WGM agenda for Weds Q3 - we will circle around to the BAM-lite so far
    • PSS development for CDA R2 (R3?) IG Product Family. This has gone nowhere… CDA R3 will be a topic for the WGM.
    • Continue discussion on model diagram
      • Still seeking reconciliation of structure for Product Family/Product Line in existing Steering Divisions; individual product family governance groups, or one overall governance group.

Adjourned 2:33 PM


Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved