This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

20130313 BAM Modeling

From HL7Wiki
Revision as of 19:07, 13 March 2013 by Llaakso (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TSC representatives and ArB to jointly develop content for the BAM for the Product Line Architecture Program

HL7 BAM Modeling Call Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
GTM 511-882-013

Date: 2013-03-13
Time: 2 pm Eastern DAYLIGHT Time
Facilitator Ron Parker Note taker(s) Lynn
Attendee Name

x Calvin Beebe
Woody Beeler
x Jane Curry
Bo Dagnall
Jean Duteau,
x Tony Julian
x Austin Kreisler,
x Lynn Laakso
Cecil Lynch
Charlie Mead
regrets Ravi Natarajan
x Ron Parker
x Brian Pech
Melva Peters
Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No)
quorum definition?



  • Approve minutes of 20130306 BAM Modeling
  • Goals and timelines
    • First three life_stage elements
    • update on where Ron/Jane stands and discuss ongoing sessions.

Reference Documents

  1. BAM Overview BAM status as of Jan WGM
  2. Fill in spreadsheet


  • Goals and timelines
    Ron and Jane have continued working through the spreadsheet but have an issue to discuss. Austin reports he's working on getting a SDWG cochairs call together.
    • Ron presents the spreadsheet. Working on this is slow when you need to brainstorm with others. Product Line Alignment discussed. Level of detail reviewed as needing to address more broad, less detailed issues. Jane describes the analogy of a parts catalogue. Architecture program might identify list/catalogue around various viewpoints.
      • There's enough done to get started. Jane and Ron can facilitate gathering information from the tool. We know enough to begin. Vitality process can be established too.
      • Education process is emphasized by Erl but we don't have much.
      • Need to articulate some of this to potential customer base to bring in these particular skills. Past experience is realm-specific, so the scope of governance is of concern. Product lines may end up being realm specific.
      • Plans to sit with the SDWG at WGM to step through the process. Tensions between getting the detail and streamlined enough to get it to work when it is received as being too complex. Need to look at what critical risks we are trying to address before introducing these steps. Surfacing roles (based on knowledge and skills) may imply the work will take longer to perform than it does to describe. We are also dependent on much information that is held in people's heads.
  • Next steps for engagement with the cochairs
    • Meet next in two weeks to grant time to coordinate SDWG cochairs meeting
  • Jane won't be in Atlanta

Adjourned 2:50 PM EDT

Meeting Outcomes

Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.