This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2012-05-28 Rx Conf Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Attendees== | ==Attendees== | ||
| − | * | + | * Melva Peters (chair) |
| − | * | + | * Tom de Jong (scribe) |
| + | * Hugh Glover | ||
| + | * Julie James | ||
| + | * Stephen Chu | ||
| + | * Marco Demarmels | ||
| + | * John Hatem | ||
==List Discussions== | ==List Discussions== | ||
| Line 28: | Line 33: | ||
** Stephen's original requirements were met by the Immunization models | ** Stephen's original requirements were met by the Immunization models | ||
** It seems like most are also covered my Med. Admin. Event/Statement | ** It seems like most are also covered my Med. Admin. Event/Statement | ||
| − | ** Question remains if Immunization should be | + | ** Question remains if Immunization should be aligned with Rx models? |
| − | * Action 1: check if requirements are met by Med. Admin. | + | ** '''Action 1''': check if requirements are met by Med. Admin./Statement |
| − | * Action 2: check with PHER how | + | ** '''Action 2''': check with PHER how to achieve closer model alignment |
==Review of Vancouver WG Meetings== | ==Review of Vancouver WG Meetings== | ||
| Line 62: | Line 67: | ||
** Stephen asks if scope includes parenteral nutrition (TPN)? | ** Stephen asks if scope includes parenteral nutrition (TPN)? | ||
** if it does, then this should be covered by Pharmacy models | ** if it does, then this should be covered by Pharmacy models | ||
| − | ** motion to approve Rx as a co-sponsor | + | ** motion to approve Rx as a co-sponsor |
| + | *** with a request for clarification on the issue of parenteral nutrition | ||
| + | *** (Stephen/Tom; 5-0-0) | ||
** '''Action''': Melva will request clarification from O&O | ** '''Action''': Melva will request clarification from O&O | ||
* Medication Profile Project | * Medication Profile Project | ||
| − | ** PSS to be reviewed | + | ** PSS has to be reviewed |
** Melva will include Stephen's comments | ** Melva will include Stephen's comments | ||
** on agenda for next call | ** on agenda for next call | ||
| Line 76: | Line 83: | ||
* lots of input from Jacqueline Surugue from IHE | * lots of input from Jacqueline Surugue from IHE | ||
* Marco gave access to the document to more people | * Marco gave access to the document to more people | ||
| − | * Action: Melva will ask Tim & Scott if they want to update the definitions | + | * '''Action''': Melva will ask Tim & Scott if they want to update the definitions |
| − | + | ** Marco will then add them as editors of the doc | |
==IHE Joint Meeting== | ==IHE Joint Meeting== | ||
| Line 83: | Line 90: | ||
* Pharmacy OOC meeting on Oct 22/23 | * Pharmacy OOC meeting on Oct 22/23 | ||
* location Paris, Phast offices | * location Paris, Phast offices | ||
| − | + | ** back-up for first two days could be Nictiz, The Hague | |
| − | * Proposal to have Pharmacy OOC meeting (Hugh/Tom | + | * Proposal to have Pharmacy OOC meeting (Hugh/Tom; 6-0-0) |
| − | * Action: Hugh will do the paperwork for the OOC meeting | + | * '''Action 1''': Hugh will do the paperwork for the OOC meeting |
| − | * Action: Tom will enquire with Phast for room on Oct 22/23 | + | * '''Action 2''': Tom will enquire with Phast for room on Oct 22/23 |
==Common Product Model== | ==Common Product Model== | ||
* Ballot reconcilliation meetings (Hugh) | * Ballot reconcilliation meetings (Hugh) | ||
| + | ** Hugh urges others to take this seriously, since several major issues will be discussed | ||
| + | ** when calls have been scheduled, there should be an effort to have good Rx participation | ||
| + | |||
==AOB== | ==AOB== | ||
Latest revision as of 22:55, 28 May 2012
|
Related Links |
Attendees
- Melva Peters (chair)
- Tom de Jong (scribe)
- Hugh Glover
- Julie James
- Stephen Chu
- Marco Demarmels
- John Hatem
List Discussions
- Immunization - Stephen Chu/Tom
- Stephen's original requirements were met by the Immunization models
- It seems like most are also covered my Med. Admin. Event/Statement
- Question remains if Immunization should be aligned with Rx models?
- Action 1: check if requirements are met by Med. Admin./Statement
- Action 2: check with PHER how to achieve closer model alignment
Review of Vancouver WG Meetings
- Teleconference schedule
- E-mail vote confirmed that current time is 'least bad'.
- Minutes
- Minutes from Vancouver need to be gathered and completed.
- Note to always make sure that a minute-taker is assigned.
- IDMP Ballot Reconciliation
- Hugh will plan times for reconciliation discussions (so Japan can join).
- After the calls, he will bring results to Pharmacy WG for a final vote.
- Quorum may be a challenge, so outcomes will not be voted on during calls.
- FIHR project approved
- forwarded to Steering Division for approval
- good session with Grahame, Lloyd and Ewout
- focus on Prescription, Dispense, Administration & Statement
- Prescription resource made by Ewout & Tom, purely as a draft
- Action: we need to discuss if we want to remove Pharmacy resource (or review it)
- Medication Statement RMIM
- is it intended to be an open query?
- most use cases would be patient-centric, but not all
- so it's not a problem that patientId is not mandatory
- Nutrition Orders Project
- request from O&O to be a co-sponsor
- Stephen asks if scope includes parenteral nutrition (TPN)?
- if it does, then this should be covered by Pharmacy models
- motion to approve Rx as a co-sponsor
- with a request for clarification on the issue of parenteral nutrition
- (Stephen/Tom; 5-0-0)
- Action: Melva will request clarification from O&O
- Medication Profile Project
- PSS has to be reviewed
- Melva will include Stephen's comments
- on agenda for next call
Glossary
- No discussion about content in Vancouver
- NCPDP offered to add their definitions
- Marco and Tom did not find a common time to meet
- lots of input from Jacqueline Surugue from IHE
- Marco gave access to the document to more people
- Action: Melva will ask Tim & Scott if they want to update the definitions
- Marco will then add them as editors of the doc
IHE Joint Meeting
- joint day with IHE on October 24th
- Pharmacy OOC meeting on Oct 22/23
- location Paris, Phast offices
- back-up for first two days could be Nictiz, The Hague
- Proposal to have Pharmacy OOC meeting (Hugh/Tom; 6-0-0)
- Action 1: Hugh will do the paperwork for the OOC meeting
- Action 2: Tom will enquire with Phast for room on Oct 22/23
Common Product Model
- Ballot reconcilliation meetings (Hugh)
- Hugh urges others to take this seriously, since several major issues will be discussed
- when calls have been scheduled, there should be an effort to have good Rx participation
