This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

2012-05-16 PA WGM Minutes

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Patient Administration Work Group Minutes - Wednesday May 16, 2012

Wednesday Q1

HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes

Location: Pavilion Ballroom B

Date: 2012-05-16
Time: Wednesday Q1
Facilitator Alex de Leon Note taker Alex de Leon
Attendee Name Affiliation
X Alex de Leon Kaiser Permanente
X Irma Jongeneel HL7 Netherlands
X Iryna Roy HL7 Canada
X Barry Guinn EPIC
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 4 members): Y

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  • V2 Work - v2.8 Comments

Supporting Documents

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

Irma, who is heading the effort to harmonize the Patient Care Care Provision Model and the Patient Administration, Encounter Model, along with the PAWG reviewed the PA submitted reconciliation comments along with the issues identified during Q4 yesterday.

Meeting Outcomes

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • .

Wednesday Q2

HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes

Location: Room #2761

Date: 2012-05-16
Time: Wednesday Q2
Facilitator Irma Jongeneel Note taker Alex de Leon
Attendee Name Affiliation
X Iryna Roy HL7 Canada
X Irma Jongeneel HL7 Netherlands
X Barry Guinn EPIC
X Alex de Leon Kaiser Permanente
X Jane Daus McKesson
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 3 members): Y

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  • V2 Work

Supporting Documents

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

The WG moved on to address the comments for Chapter 3 using the comments spreadsheet.

Meeting Outcomes

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • .

Wednesday Q3

HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes

Location: Room #2761

Date: 2012-05-16
Time: Wednesday Q3
Facilitator Irma Jongeneel Note taker Alex de Leon
Attendee Name Affiliation
X Irma Jongeneel HL7 Netherlands
X Jane Daus McKesson
X Barry Guinn EPIC
X Alex de Leon Kaiser Permanente
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 4 members): Yes

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  • Approve San Antonio Minutes
  • Plan next meeting - draft agenda

Supporting Documents

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

Alex moved to approve the minutes from San Antonio, Jane seconded. Vote: 2/0/1 The WG continued to draft the agenda. Items to keep in mind were:

  • Joint meeting with Patient Care Q2 on Tuesday
  • Christian Hay presentation Q4 on Monday
  • Service Delivery Location request for a quarter. To be decided upon response from Lise Stevens and Peter Goldschmidt.

Meeting Outcomes

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
  • .
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • .

Wednesday Q4

HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes

Location: Room# 2761

Date: 2012-05-16
Time: Wednesday Q4
Facilitator Irma Jongeneel Note taker Alex de Leon
Attendee Name Affiliation
X Irma Jongeneel HL7 Netherlands
X Jane Daus McKesson
X Barry Guinn EPIC
X Alex de Leon Kaiser PermanenteD
X Wendy Huang Canada Infoway
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 2 members): Yes

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  • Harmonization Proposals
  1. Encounter Link
  2. IncedentalServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType
  3. IDENT
  4. Provider priveilede and restriction in the Provider Registry message

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
The WG proceeded with the review of the analysis done by Alexander Henket of the PA DMIM for Patient - Dutch Use Cases. The following actions were taken

  1. Action Item: Replace content from patientEntityChoiceSubject with the current Activate Person R-MIM
  • Decided to only replace the member structure in the patient activate RMIM with the member structure in the person activate.

Action Item: Replace PatientOfOtherProvider.A_PrincipalCareProvision with Role.CareProvision.performer.R_ResponsibleParty.

  • The CMET was the newer solution, thererefor this needs to be fixed in the DMIM.

The Person topic covers non Patients as well, which means that certain attributes are specific to Patient...

  • For this, the WG decided that we need more information on what the request is, with regarding to some of the listed items. Therefore the WG decided to move on to the other items.

Changed Personal relatiohship from E_LivingSubject to E_Person this should align with person activiate so change both or none.

  • The WG agreed that they shound align and that they should relate to E_Person in both RMIM and D-MIM.

Added Member2 and relationship to ObservationEvent to support conveying houshold

  • The WG accepts this change.

Add Citizen.code

  • The WG accepts this addition to patient

Added Employee.code

  • The WG accepts this addition.

Added Guardian.Code

  • The WG accepts this addition.

Patient Revise
Give this R-MIM the exact same content below the patientEntityChoiceSubject as Activate Patient

  • The WG accepts this proposal.

Patient Demographics
Give this R-MIM the exact same content below the patientEntityChoiceSubject as Activate Patient

  • The WG accetps this proposal.

Patient Identifiers
Replace comparable content in this R-MIM with Person Identifiers

  • The WG accepts this with the clarification that the replacement content is derived from the new Demographic R-MIM with all accepted contstraints.

Patient Nullify
Replace comparable content in this R-MIM with the Person Nullify

  • The WG did not see any difference in the models.

Patient Registry Query by Demogrphics Why are most query parameters are 0...* which means AND logic? It is unlikely that someone has e.g. mulitple bith times. All value attributs are already 1..* so the OR logic is covered.

  • The cardinality (0..*) on the query parameter is to support RIM query infrastructure.

Patient Registry Query by Identifier Why are most query parameters are 0...* which means AND logic? It is unlikely that someone has e.g. mulitple bith times. Use logic

  • The cardinality (0..*) on the query parameter is to support RIM query infrastructure.

Patient Registry Find Candidates Reponses

  • The WG accepts this proposals

A motion was made by Alex to accept the changes outlined above Seconded by Jane

Vote: 5/0/0

Meeting Outcomes

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
  • .
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • .

Navigation

© 2011 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.