20110810 SAIF AP ConCall

SAIF Architecture Program – 2011-08-10 Meeting

Return to SAIF Architecture Program Wiki Home Page<br\> Return to SAIF AP Meeting Minutes and Agendas

Meeting Logistics

• Dates: Weekly on Wednesdays
• Time: 10:00 - 11:00 Eastern
• Phone Number: +1 (706) 634-4215 NOTE: This call is using the pilot conference calling number!!!
• Participant Passcode: 124466
• Web Coordinates: https://www2.gotomeeting.com/join/768017802 Meeting ID: 768-017-802

Agenda

1. Role Call
2. Agenda Review
3. Adoption Process Document updates from Project Services (Haddorff) ( HL7AdoptionProcess_draftV10.doc )
   1. Peer Review comment spreadsheet form adapted from Ballot Comment spreadsheet( Review comments_ArtifactName_draft1.xls )
      1. Developed by Project Services at suggestion of SAIF AP in conjunction with proposed adoption process
4. Prepping for the Sept WGM Meeting
   1. Present what needs to be done for a RASCI chart (which will be a Sept WGM agenda item) (Haddorff)
   2. SD WG Tuesday Q3 session in San Diego (CDA R3 and SAIF) – invite SAIF AP people to attend that, if interested.
6. Recurring Agenda Items
   1. New Agenda items for San Diego Sept. WGM – Wednesday Q4: 20110914_SAIF_AP_Meeting
      1. Add the following to the Agenda: SAIF and Sound White paper???
   2. Pilot Coordination updates (Rick Haddorff)
      1. Any new Coordination items? (Team)
      2. Project Schedule progress (Rick Haddorff)
7. Action item review (see below)
8. Next steps
9. Please complete the conference calling pilot survey. Next week starts the pilot of the new platform

Action Items to Review

• None to review

Link to the Complete List of Action Items/Issues/Risks (GForge)

Meeting Attendees

X=Present on Call

Facilitator	Austin Kreisler	Note taker(s)	David Hamill
Attendee	Name	Affiliation
X	Austin Kreisler	TSC Chair
	Brian Pech	Interested Participant
X	David Hamill	HL7 HQ / Program Manager
	Ed Tripp	Domain Experts SD \ TSC
	Gregg Seppala	Product Quality Plan Project
	Jane Curry	Tooling
	Jim McClay	Emergency Care
	John Moehrke	Security Cookbook
	John Quinn	HL7 CTO
	Lloyd McKenzie	MnM Work Group / SAIF Implementation Guide Pjt
	Lorraine Constable	Composite Order Pjt \ OO Behavioral Framework Pjt
	Patrick Loyd	OO Work Group / Composite Order Pjt
X	Rick Haddorff	Project Services WG / SAIF Pilot Coordination Pjt
	Robert Lario	Object Management
X	Pat Van Dyke	EHR WG
X	Steve Hufnagel	ArB / SAIF Book Project / SOA
	Wendy Huang	Implementation Conformance WG
	Gary Dickinson	EHR WG
	Freida Hall	Project Services WG
Quorum Requirements Met: No

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

Adoption Process Document updates

Re: the following update in the document:

• Removing the requirement that a Project Scope Statement must be created. Additionally, a paragraph was included explaining instances where a PSS is not required along with Pros/Cons of creating a PSS.
• Austin: Add another line focusing on if another Work Group is adversely impacted by a WG’s internal process, they can petition the TSC and recommend that a Project Scope Statement be created since the proposed process is not internal just to the one WG.

Re: Verbiage focusing on Comment Only is subject to ANSI balloting rules may be incorrect. Project Services will research.

• Austin added the following:
• Con for non-ballot approaches: Runs the risk of not getting people’s attention
• Pro for Comment Only Ballot: Get’s people’s attentions better

• Austin: A lot of Mandated HL7 processes are not part of the WG Health Metrics. Hence, change this to ‘are candidates for WG Health Metrics’ instead of ‘will’
• Regarding the Outstanding Issue indicating that a Work Group should create and maintain a Wiki Page for Informal Ballot Comments, the group agreed that this should be removed, and allow WG’s to decide how they want to do that.

Peer Review comment spreadsheet form adapted from Ballot Comment spreadsheet

• SAIF AP Team should review the document and provide feedback.
• The goal of the spreadsheet is to capture and reconcile comments submitted regarding the proposed process for adoption.

Prepping for the Sept 2011 WGM Meeting

• Rick reviewed the RASCI chart today.
• Once active, may want to do the RASCI chart retroactively
• Rick will work with CDA R3 as the pilot for the RASCI chart and hopefully will have it completed enough to present at the Sept 2011 WGM.
• SAIF and Sound Whitepaper update: It’s dependant on MnM completing work on the artifact definition. Hence there probably won’t be much to report on at the September 2011 WGM.

Gforge Accounts can be requested via: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/account/?action=UserAdd

Adjourned 10:55 AM Eastern Time

New Action Items

Rick – Add a line based on Austin’s suggestion about if another Work Group is adversely impacted by a WG’s internal process, they can petition the TSC and recommend that a Project Scope Statement be created since the proposed process is not internal just to the one WG.
Rick – Wordsmith Change to the Adoption Process document ‘defining a Project Scope Statement’ to ‘creating a Project Scope Statement’
Rick – Follow up regarding the Adoption Process verbiage focusing on “Comment Only is subject to ANSI balloting rules” as this may be incorrect.
Rick – Add the Pros/Cons regarding getting people’s attention
Rick – Re: Not all mandated HL7 processes are not part of the WG Health Metrics. Hence, change this to ‘are candidates for WG Health Metrics’ instead of ‘will’
Rick – Remove the Outstanding Issue indicating that a Work Group should create and maintain a Wiki Page for Informal Ballot Comments
Austin/Rick – Have Rick attend a CDA R3 call to bring forward the RASCI work to that project.