This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20110413 SAIF AP ConCall"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 139: Line 139:
 
<br\><br\>
 
<br\><br\>
 
[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/saif-arch-pgm/tracker/?action=&br_trackerssort_by=tracker.DESCRIPTION&br_trackerssort_order=asc Link to the Complete List of Action Items/Issues/Risks (GForge)]
 
[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/saif-arch-pgm/tracker/?action=&br_trackerssort_by=tracker.DESCRIPTION&br_trackerssort_order=asc Link to the Complete List of Action Items/Issues/Risks (GForge)]
 +
 +
 +
===Minutes===
 +
<!---================================================================
 +
|                                                                  |
 +
|  MM    MM  IIIIII  NN    NN  UU  UU  TTTTTT  EEEEEE  SSSSS    |
 +
|  MMM  MMM    II    NNN  NN  UU  UU    TT    EE      SS        |
 +
|  MM MMM MM    II    NN NN NN  UU  UU    TT    EEEE    SSSS      |
 +
|  MM  M  MM    II    NN  NNN  UU  UU    TT    EE          SS    |
 +
|  MM    MM  IIIIII  NN    NN  UUUU    TT    EEEEEE  SSSSS      |
 +
|                                                                  |
 +
=================================================================--->
 +
<!-- <br/> carriage break to copy  ******-->
 +
 +
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
 +
 +
'''Approve Mission/Charter<br/>
 +
*Will evolve over time, but we can approve what we have today.<br/>
 +
*'''Motion: ''' Approve Mission/Charter.  In Favor: 9 / Opposed: 0 / Abstain: 0<br/>
 +
*Mission/Charter was approved.
 +
 +
'''Update on HL7 Product Quality Plan convergence with SAIF AP
 +
*Monday’s Quality Plan conference call focus was on processes to produce a quality product.
 +
*The Quality Plan is morphing into identifying what things need to be governed in the SAIF AP.  The governance will enable and drive quality standards. 
 +
*Discussed how the Quality Plan impacts the HDF, as SAIF will imply changes to the HDF.
 +
*All processes need to be maintained – i.e. subject to recurring assessment of how they are performing and conduct necessary updates.  Perhaps similar to the Strategic Initiatives process that has an annual cycle for review and updates.
 +
*Also, we will need to be able to measure quality as well.  Note that the PSS is missing this objective.  The Quality Plan team plans on adding this to the objectives.  Also note that the PSS was written about a year ago, and perhaps much of the scope has changed.  The TSC will be reviewing the current PSS and address any changes.
 +
 +
 +
'''Planning for the May WGM in Orlando
 +
*Wednesday Q4
 +
*Suggested Agenda Topics:
 +
**Review the charter
 +
**Review status of Projects<br/>
 +
***Pilot Coordination Project’s work on the SAIF BF WG spreadsheet<br/>
 +
***Project Services meets Mon Q3 at the May WGM<br/>
 +
**Begin discussion of governance, and what it should look like
 +
 +
*ArB is still working on their agenda.  Austin was wondering when they were going to focus on ballot reconciliation.
 +
*Steve H. indicated that ArB does meet Sunday at the WGM, and he thought the ArB would use Sunday for ballot reconciliation, and will probably flow into other ArB meetings during the week.
 +
 +
 +
'''Detail out the SAIF BF WG spreadsheet
 +
*Rick H. will take the lead on this work
 +
 +
 +
'''Scribe Volunteers for the 4/6 call or cancel next weeks call? <br/>
 +
No meeting on 4/6.
 +
 +
 +
 +
Gforge Accounts can be requested via:
 +
http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/account/?action=UserAdd
 +
 +
 +
''Adjourned 10:44 AM Eastern Time

Revision as of 15:40, 15 April 2011

SAIF Architecture Program – 2011-04-13 Meeting

Return to SAIF Architecture Program Wiki Home Page<br\> Return to SAIF AP Meeting Minutes and Agendas

Meeting Logistics

Agenda

  1. Role Call
  2. Agenda Review
  3. Enterprise Architect (EA) update (John Quinn) (Tracker 1865)
  4. Petition to accept CDA R3 into the SAIF Architecture Program
  5. Review SAIF & Sound from Project Services (Rick Haddorff)
  6. Discuss Communication Plan (Tracker 1866)
  7. Discuss Recruiting for Project Leads
    1. Tracker 1864 - Attend an INM call; find a Project Lead for the INM Wrapper Project #619
  8. Quality Plan PSS Revisions (Gregg Seppala) (Tracker 1878)
  9. Action item review (see below)
  10. Next steps

Meeting Attendees

Facilitator Austin Kreisler Note taker(s) David Hamill
Attendee Name Affiliation
X Austin Kreisler TSC Chair
Brian Pech
X David Hamill HL7 HQ / Program Manager
Ed Tripp Domain Experts SD \ TSC
X Gregg Seppala Product Quality Plan Project
Jane Curry Tooling
X Jim McClay Emergency Care
John Quinn HL7 CTO
X Lloyd McKenzie MnM Work Group / SAIF Implementation Guide Pjt
Lorraine Constable Composite Order Pjt \ OO Behavioral Framework Pjt
X Lynn Laakso HL7 HQ / TSC Project Manager
X Patrick Loyd OO Work Group / Composite Order Pjt
X Rick Haddorff Project Services WG / SAIF Pilot Coordination Pjt
Robert Lario Object Management
Steve Hufnagel ArB / SAIF Book Project
Wendy Huang
Quorum Requirements Met: Yes
quorum achieved as defined in the Work Group Decision Making Practices?


Action Items to Review

1850: ID List of Tools that the Composite Order Project Need<br\> Patrick identified Collab Net. this week. Any others? Next step for Collab Net? <br\> Discussion During Call: Collab Net is freeware, and Patrick, Lorraine can access it. However, in the future, if we have 50 or 100 people using it, should we form a relationship with Collab Net? Ask John Quinn for his input on this. <br\><br\> 1867: Determine what XML editor should be used for our work. <br\> Team, When should we begin work on this action item? <br\> Discussion During Call: Patrick: When MnM decides what the schemas will look like, that’s when we need it. Until then, we’ll manually create schemas.<br\> This item will require coordination with MnM and Tooling.<br\> Lloyd: Estimates that we should discuss this item around July.<br\> The PS WG’s coordination project needs to coordinate this effort. <br\><br\> 1863: Attend Strruc Doc’s CDA R3 call<br\> 1861: Have Austin or Patrick join the EHR call (Tuesdays 2:30-4pm) and SOA call, Mondays at 4pm<br\> FYI: Patrick and Austin attended the EHR call on Tuesday; will join SOA next week. <br\> Austin's update from the EHR call: They have already been doing work to align with SAIF so I invited them to join one of our upcoming calls to present on that subject. They are tentatively scheduled for the 4/27 call (I've added that to the agenda for that day). Steve Hufnagle is probably going to the be presenter. I encouraged them to start participating in the SAIF AP calls, join the list server and participate in the MNM Artifact definition calls. I also indicated we need to figure out how EHR FM and the OO Composite order project need to work together. At least the dialog has been started. <br\><br\> 1851: Logo Ideas for the SAIF AP<br\> FYI: Two have been submitted and uploaded to SAIF AP's GForge Doc tab <br\><br\> Link to the Complete List of Action Items/Issues/Risks (GForge)


Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

Approve Mission/Charter

  • Will evolve over time, but we can approve what we have today.
  • Motion: Approve Mission/Charter. In Favor: 9 / Opposed: 0 / Abstain: 0
  • Mission/Charter was approved.

Update on HL7 Product Quality Plan convergence with SAIF AP

  • Monday’s Quality Plan conference call focus was on processes to produce a quality product.
  • The Quality Plan is morphing into identifying what things need to be governed in the SAIF AP. The governance will enable and drive quality standards.
  • Discussed how the Quality Plan impacts the HDF, as SAIF will imply changes to the HDF.
  • All processes need to be maintained – i.e. subject to recurring assessment of how they are performing and conduct necessary updates. Perhaps similar to the Strategic Initiatives process that has an annual cycle for review and updates.
  • Also, we will need to be able to measure quality as well. Note that the PSS is missing this objective. The Quality Plan team plans on adding this to the objectives. Also note that the PSS was written about a year ago, and perhaps much of the scope has changed. The TSC will be reviewing the current PSS and address any changes.


Planning for the May WGM in Orlando

  • Wednesday Q4
  • Suggested Agenda Topics:
    • Review the charter
    • Review status of Projects
      • Pilot Coordination Project’s work on the SAIF BF WG spreadsheet
      • Project Services meets Mon Q3 at the May WGM
    • Begin discussion of governance, and what it should look like
  • ArB is still working on their agenda. Austin was wondering when they were going to focus on ballot reconciliation.
  • Steve H. indicated that ArB does meet Sunday at the WGM, and he thought the ArB would use Sunday for ballot reconciliation, and will probably flow into other ArB meetings during the week.


Detail out the SAIF BF WG spreadsheet

  • Rick H. will take the lead on this work


Scribe Volunteers for the 4/6 call or cancel next weeks call?
No meeting on 4/6.


Gforge Accounts can be requested via: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/account/?action=UserAdd


Adjourned 10:44 AM Eastern Time