This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20100826 arb minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
* Attendees: Charlie Mead - chair, John Koish, Cecil Lynch, Steve Hufnagel, Wendell Ocasio, Andy Bond, Jane Curry | * Attendees: Charlie Mead - chair, John Koish, Cecil Lynch, Steve Hufnagel, Wendell Ocasio, Andy Bond, Jane Curry | ||
| + | * The urgent requirement to communicate our intent for the SAIF Tutorials was added | ||
| + | * Steve moved and Cecil seconded to approve the minutes from 201008 | ||
* What are we going to do for the afternoon tutorial | * What are we going to do for the afternoon tutorial | ||
| − | ** What are the things you have to have to worry about to implement SAIF | + | ** Intro session (30 minutes)Ron?? |
| − | ** How are you going to govern the things you have to worry about | + | *** What are the things you have to have to worry about to implement SAIF |
| − | ** What are the artifacts that are you might pull together to implement SAIF | + | *** How are you going to govern the things you have to worry about |
| − | ** How can you simplify to manage complexity | + | *** What are the artifacts that are you might pull together to implement SAIF |
| − | ** How have different organizations approached the problem | + | *** How can you simplify to manage complexity |
| − | *** NEHTA | + | ** How have different organizations approached the problem(15 minutes - 10 minutes of questions each) |
| + | *** NEHTA | ||
*** DOD | *** DOD | ||
*** Infoway | *** Infoway | ||
*** NCI | *** NCI | ||
| + | ** Questions | ||
** What is the cross enterprise benefit with the different approaches. What needs to be harmonized and what doesn't matter. | ** What is the cross enterprise benefit with the different approaches. What needs to be harmonized and what doesn't matter. | ||
| Line 55: | Line 59: | ||
** Steve accepted the responsibility to draft the learning objectives and basic organization of the proposed tutorial and send to the other participants for concurrence before submitting to HQ | ** Steve accepted the responsibility to draft the learning objectives and basic organization of the proposed tutorial and send to the other participants for concurrence before submitting to HQ | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | * | ||
Revision as of 22:42, 26 August 2010
Template:Arb minutes Architecture Board Aubust 26, 2010 Late Call
logistics
Time: 6:00pm U.S. Eastern
Please consult http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock for your local times
1. Please join my meeting. https://www2.gotomeeting.com/join/778332282
Or go to www.gotomeeting.com At the top of the page click on the join meeting button
Then enter Meeting ID: 778-332-282
2. Join the conference call: Dial 770-657-9270 Passcode 854126#
Agenda
- Call to order
- Approval of Agenda
- approval of Minutes
- Review of action items
- Review of Wiki Pages
- Other business and planning for next meeting
- Adjournment
Minutes
- Attendees: Charlie Mead - chair, John Koish, Cecil Lynch, Steve Hufnagel, Wendell Ocasio, Andy Bond, Jane Curry
- The urgent requirement to communicate our intent for the SAIF Tutorials was added
- Steve moved and Cecil seconded to approve the minutes from 201008
- What are we going to do for the afternoon tutorial
- Intro session (30 minutes)Ron??
- What are the things you have to have to worry about to implement SAIF
- How are you going to govern the things you have to worry about
- What are the artifacts that are you might pull together to implement SAIF
- How can you simplify to manage complexity
- How have different organizations approached the problem(15 minutes - 10 minutes of questions each)
- NEHTA
- DOD
- Infoway
- NCI
- Questions
- What is the cross enterprise benefit with the different approaches. What needs to be harmonized and what doesn't matter.
- Intro session (30 minutes)Ron??
- Examples of applying SAIF to specific problems
- Steve talked about using the services architecture as the engineering viewpoint at the conceptual level
- Steve accepted the responsibility to draft the learning objectives and basic organization of the proposed tutorial and send to the other participants for concurrence before submitting to HQ
