This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20100204 arb minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (New page: Cliff Thompson, Patrick Loyd, Jane Curry, Tony Julian, Ron Parker *Call to order *Approval of Agenda *Approval of Minutes * * *) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Approval of Agenda | *Approval of Agenda | ||
*Approval of Minutes | *Approval of Minutes | ||
| − | * | + | *First rough draft of governance framework - Jane |
| − | * | + | *TSC results: |
| − | * | + | **From the TSC meeting today.... Turns out TSC still wants us to do all the work. Damn! |
| + | **That 3rd item on harmonization meetings... that could be a very interesting discussion on the part of the group. Maybe I will throw a little deck together. Or better, ping Grahame and John on what they think it should look like. | ||
| + | **Name has been changed to SAIF. ArB is responsible for communications plan. I will write a short article for the HL7 news letter updating the community on the SAIF Book, name change, EA-IP, etc. | ||
| + | ** Peer review process will be discussed in detail next week. However, the TSC endorses it and will at least partially sponsor it. | ||
| + | ** TSC wants a concrete proposal for initiating RIM-style harmonization meetings – which they favor conceptually – including sample harmonization materials. Discussion is postponed until the ArB can provide materials for discussion | ||
| + | ** TSC wants to know if the Orders and Observations SAIF project charter was approved by the ArB. Answer? | ||
Revision as of 16:08, 4 February 2010
Cliff Thompson, Patrick Loyd, Jane Curry, Tony Julian, Ron Parker
- Call to order
- Approval of Agenda
- Approval of Minutes
- First rough draft of governance framework - Jane
- TSC results:
- From the TSC meeting today.... Turns out TSC still wants us to do all the work. Damn!
- That 3rd item on harmonization meetings... that could be a very interesting discussion on the part of the group. Maybe I will throw a little deck together. Or better, ping Grahame and John on what they think it should look like.
- Name has been changed to SAIF. ArB is responsible for communications plan. I will write a short article for the HL7 news letter updating the community on the SAIF Book, name change, EA-IP, etc.
- Peer review process will be discussed in detail next week. However, the TSC endorses it and will at least partially sponsor it.
- TSC wants a concrete proposal for initiating RIM-style harmonization meetings – which they favor conceptually – including sample harmonization materials. Discussion is postponed until the ArB can provide materials for discussion
- TSC wants to know if the Orders and Observations SAIF project charter was approved by the ArB. Answer?
