20081120 arb minutes
Architecture and Review Board Meeting Minutes
November 20, 2008
|Curry, Jane||ArB||Yes||Health Information Strategiesfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Grieve, Grahame||ArB||No||Kestral Computingemail@example.com|
|Julian, Tony||ArB||Yes||Mayo Clinicfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Lynch, Cecil||ArB||No||ontoreason LLCemail@example.com|
|Mead, Charlie||ArB||Yes||Booz Allen Hamiltonfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Parker, Ron||ArB||No||CA Infowayemail@example.com|
|Quinn, John||ArB||No||Health Level Seven, Inc.||jquinn@HL7.org|
|Shakir, Abdul-Malik||ArB||No||Shakir Consulting||ShakirConsulting@cs.com|
|Walker, Mead||ArB||Yes||Health Data and Interoperabilityfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Yongjian, Bao||ArB||Yes||GE Healthcareemail@example.com|
|Bear, Yogi(template)||Guest||No||US Dept. Interior, National Park Servicefirstname.lastname@example.org|
Call to order
Discussion of Next Steps
CM: I discussed this with the TSC. They understood and are in favor of going forward. The TSC is aware of the fact that there are significant impacts. There are two projects going forward with this approach. We are at a dead stop until the TSC defines who will take charge at what point.
JK: One of the things that is interesting is that the TSC has spent a lot of time communicating with us. All of the HL7 discussions with HITSP have taken shape and are fostering meaningful discussions. We need to understand what they want. I did make liberal use of our Mantra: This is hard! “Oh <expletive deleted”! “Don’t panic.”
JC: It is understood that there may be panic for any change.
JK:There is little we can do at this point. We can collect the concrete stuff for education. The SAEAF is in CM’s hands. The Behavioral Framework is being worked on by John, Alan Honey and others. I don’t know what shape the January meeting will take.
CM:Tony: Can you get the peer review comments posted to the wiki after I finish with them?
JC: if we are doing a teleconference we need to announce it sooner rather than later. They will read in motivations if we do or don’t or don’t say anything. Silence is not equivalent to “No News”.
JK: I am going to continue to try to talk to CM and Charlie McKay.
JK:I wanted to make sure that the TSC understands that they are the limiting factor.
CM:We don’t want to send out a meeting overstepping the TSC.
JC: A re-draft of the SAEAF document and the corresponding decision about whether we draw the Behavioral Framework into it: I would vote to pull the BF into the SAEAF. Need a cross-reference between the two.
JK: I thought the decision was made.
JC:I thought the decision was on your slide.
JK: I think it should be in.
CM:I agree that it should be in SAEAF to avoid consistency problems.
JC: We need to look long term at the publication structure.
CM:Conformance, Compliance, governance need to be done also. Our next hurdle is SAEAF for Orlando, pulling in the Behavioral Framework.
JK: Do you mean ballot publication?
JC: The ballot is where we put methodology as well as standards.
JK:The issue is all publications.
JK: There is TSC urgency as well as ARB urgency.
JC: If we can minimize the disruption we will be successful. It sounds to me that we should cut this call short, assume there will be conversation at the TSC meeting.
JK: I will send out a note.
TJ: We need to set the date.
CM: We will remind the TSC.
Motion to adjourn at 3:31pm Jane C /Tony J
Tony 20:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)