This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20080715 ARB Jump StartMinutes"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 7: Line 7:
 
*
 
*
 
*8-9 - organization, procedures, etc.  
 
*8-9 - organization, procedures, etc.  
*9-10 - Review of Work in June and additional topics for this session:  
+
== 9-10 - Review of Work in June and additional topics for this session: ==
**John discussed the HL7 Enterprise Architecture slide deck as ammended during the June Jump-start meeting.
+
 +
*John discussed the HL7 Enterprise Architecture slide deck as ammended during the June Jump-start meeting.
 
** John introduced the HL7 EA diagram as part of the discussion.
 
** John introduced the HL7 EA diagram as part of the discussion.
 
***John Quinn and the TSC as directed by the HL7 Board is being pushed to create conformance specifications for HITSP, CEN, and others including SOA.   
 
***John Quinn and the TSC as directed by the HL7 Board is being pushed to create conformance specifications for HITSP, CEN, and others including SOA.   
Line 15: Line 16:
 
** Mead volunteered to work on a glossary of terms.
 
** Mead volunteered to work on a glossary of terms.
 
*** Integration
 
*** Integration
*** Intefacting
+
*** Intefaceing
 
*** Interoperability
 
*** Interoperability
 
** <question><EA slide 6>How do we discrimitate between domain solutions and use case solutions.
 
** <question><EA slide 6>How do we discrimitate between domain solutions and use case solutions.
Line 27: Line 28:
 
*** Should Business and Information be required at the Domain level.
 
*** Should Business and Information be required at the Domain level.
  
**Governance  
+
*Governance  
 
**tbBAM  
 
**tbBAM  
**Conformance Class Model  
+
*Conformance Class Model  
 
**Dynamic Framework  
 
**Dynamic Framework  
 
*Service Specification Methodology, including sample artifacts roster  
 
*Service Specification Methodology, including sample artifacts roster  
  
*10-11 – Top Down Framework ++
+
== 10-11 – Top Down Framework ==
 +
 
 
**- Trading Partner Agreements,  
 
**- Trading Partner Agreements,  
 
**review and development of ‘bull’s eye’ view of services in an HL7 context, including consequences on the outer rings of the Bulls Eye, including improved presentation that is updated with more current concepts  
 
**review and development of ‘bull’s eye’ view of services in an HL7 context, including consequences on the outer rings of the Bulls Eye, including improved presentation that is updated with more current concepts  
 
**Include Discussion of Deliverables in September (Expectations, Table of Contents, etc.)  
 
**Include Discussion of Deliverables in September (Expectations, Table of Contents, etc.)  
  
*11-12 – open discussion with Observers  
+
 
*12-1 – lunch  
+
== 11-12 – open discussion with Observers ==
*1-3 – review of SOA TC Dynamic Model proposal and current DM work  
+
 
*3-4 – Discussion of Service Contracts, UPMS  
+
== 12-1 – lunch ==
*4-5 - Discussion with Observers  
+
*Optional Topic - Entity, State, Acts, and Services  
+
 
*Day 2:
+
== 1-3 – review of SOA TC Dynamic Model proposal and current DM work ==
*8-10 - Conformance and Compliance, Conformance Models
+
*10-11 – Review of tbBAM Modeling
+
 
*11-12 – open discussion with Observers
+
== 3-4 – Discussion of Service Contracts, UPMS ==
*12-1 – lunch
+
*1-3 – Service Specifications, Conformance
+
 
*3-4 – tbBAM modeling
+
== 4-5 - Discussion with Observers ==
*4-5 – open discussion with Observers
+
*Day 3 (1/2 days):
+
 
*8-9 -- open discussion with Observers
+
== Optional Topic - Entity, State, Acts, and Services ==
*9-10 -- Project and Product Database
 
*10-11 -- wrap up, task assignment, and project plan for intervening 4 weeks until third meeting
 
*Lunch (Optional)
 
*Afternoon working session (optional)
 
*
 
*Note that the afternoon sessions on Wednesday may be held more informally, and could be used to wrap up in-process work (tbBAM, implications of other topics, for example)
 

Revision as of 13:32, 15 July 2008

Minutes: The meeting was called to order at 8:30am by John Koisch with Tony Julian as the scribe.

    • Attendees: Mead Walker, John Koisch, Tony Julian, Abdul-Malik Shakir, Jane Curry
    • Visitors: Alex DeJong, Dave Torok
  • The agenda July2008OutOfCycleMeeting posted to the wiki was approved AMS/Tony.
  • 8-9 - organization, procedures, etc.

9-10 - Review of Work in June and additional topics for this session:

  • John discussed the HL7 Enterprise Architecture slide deck as ammended during the June Jump-start meeting.
    • John introduced the HL7 EA diagram as part of the discussion.
      • John Quinn and the TSC as directed by the HL7 Board is being pushed to create conformance specifications for HITSP, CEN, and others including SOA.
      • It was discussed that the Work Group is a type of Internal Policy Maker.
    • The goal of the EA is to define the levels of the architecture.(page 3).
    • Mead volunteered to work on a glossary of terms.
      • Integration
      • Intefaceing
      • Interoperability
    • <question><EA slide 6>How do we discrimitate between domain solutions and use case solutions.
    • Alex question: We decided to use RM-ODP to provide the framework for our deliverable. Each viewpoint can create a core specification, so that when you put them together you get a full specification.
    • Slides 8&9
      • There was significant discussion of the meanings of the terms Domain and Use Case. E.G. the Dynamic model is at the Reference level, while and instance of a Dynamic model is at the Use Case level.
      • It is implicit that a large portion of the HL7 work will be at the Use Case level.
    • Slide 8
      • Reference was made optional at the Business, Information, and Computation viewpoints.
      • Should Business and Information be required at the Domain level.
  • Governance
    • tbBAM
  • Conformance Class Model
    • Dynamic Framework
  • Service Specification Methodology, including sample artifacts roster

10-11 – Top Down Framework

    • - Trading Partner Agreements,
    • review and development of ‘bull’s eye’ view of services in an HL7 context, including consequences on the outer rings of the Bulls Eye, including improved presentation that is updated with more current concepts
    • Include Discussion of Deliverables in September (Expectations, Table of Contents, etc.)


11-12 – open discussion with Observers

12-1 – lunch

1-3 – review of SOA TC Dynamic Model proposal and current DM work

3-4 – Discussion of Service Contracts, UPMS

4-5 - Discussion with Observers

Optional Topic - Entity, State, Acts, and Services