This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20080618 arbJumpStartminutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
*** Ongoing project with JK and GG | *** Ongoing project with JK and GG | ||
** Service Specification Methodology (including artifacts) | ** Service Specification Methodology (including artifacts) | ||
− | *** Relevant work form Infoway, | + | *** Relevant work form Infoway, DoD, NCI |
** Examples | ** Examples | ||
* AMS: we should approach other SDO's to discuss service specification and the intersection of MDA and services | * AMS: we should approach other SDO's to discuss service specification and the intersection of MDA and services |
Revision as of 17:43, 18 June 2008
Attendees
- Charlie Mead
- Nancy Orvis
- AbdulMalik Shakir
- Tony Julian
- Jane Curry
- John Quinn
- Scott Robertson
- Galen Mulrooney
- Rich Rogers
Agenda
- refine scope statement - more concrete
- focused mon Services approach for HL7
- Relate to Dynamic Model
- Dynamic Model is where HL7 is lacking
- HSSP creates / if focused on SFM a functional requirements document which, currently, gets thrown over the fence to OMG; have to get to implementable spec
Minutes
- Discussion of topics for September. Needs to be aligned with the
- Dynamic Framework
- Service Taxonomy Ftramework
- Service Description / Contract / Metadata
- Service Roadmap
- Service Specification Methodology (including artifacts)
- Use of Static Semantics (IM, Vocab, DT's)
- Take EHR FM as a starting point for semantics where appropriate
- Implementation Guides
- Communication Plan
- Tooling Requirements
- Examples
- Next Steps
- Governance
- Current HSSP Practice
- RLUS
- EIS
- Decision Support
- Clinical Research Filter Query
- But no progress on the OMG side, Only functional spec, still need the implementable spec
- John Q's request wants to have implementable spec coming out of HL7, at least a Platform Independent Specification
- Charlie: "Separate choreography from orchestration"
- choreography = how things can interact
- orchestration = proscriptive, must be done this way
- BPL - orchestration tool, static structure for runtime, very defined, very specific
- another analogy:
- orchestration = a string of beads
- choreography = the beads and rules on how they can be strung together
- Prioritized List (and status, existing work threads)
- Governance
- tbBAM, including the role of ArB (which is not specified today)
- Conformance Class Model
- Dynamic Framework
- Ongoing project with JK and GG
- Service Specification Methodology (including artifacts)
- Relevant work form Infoway, DoD, NCI
- Examples
- Governance
- AMS: we should approach other SDO's to discuss service specification and the intersection of MDA and services