This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Conference call minutes 16 October 2014
Revision as of 06:15, 17 October 2014 by Michael tan (talk | contribs) (Created page with " ==AGENDA== a. Ballot Reconciliation ===Ballot Reconciliation:=== #Page 24 – question 5 – Sub- concerns – what is the inferred relationship? A refined diagnosis is ...")
AGENDA
a. Ballot Reconciliation
Ballot Reconciliation:
- Page 24 – question 5 – Sub- concerns – what is the inferred relationship? A refined diagnosis is managed temporally, but a superclass (cancer) but may have multiple children. If the two children are not related how is this represented?
- Concerns can be related
- Concerns can be subconcerns
- Concerns are merged
Disposition – Will reflect in clinical models in the future. (Considered for future use)
- Page 25 – renumber list to Scenario 1. (Persuasive)
- Page 32 – Scenario 1 – suggestions for the scenario – will update as suggested. (Persuasive)
- Interaction Diagram – pages 15 and 16 – updated wording suggestion found persuasive. (Persuasive)
- Health Care Concern – Diagram 6 – Patient Component Relationship -- comment found persuasive with mod. Will remove patient component relationship.
- Health Care Concern – Diagram 6 – Component Relationship Kind – will develop values for component relationship kind.
- Page 20 – Component relationship kind – will add note that values are not exhaustive. (Persuasive).
- Introduction – Row 4 – Comment re statement on goals – bullets are ambiguous. Will reword to provide clarity.
- Figure 1 – Request to clearly label the start date and end date to disambiguate the health concern start date and the condition start date. Recommend have health concern start date and condition start date.
- Block vote – Michael/Jay – Against – 0, Abstain – 0, In favor - 4