This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
2014-09-08 Rx Conf Call
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
Related Links |
Attendees
- Melva Peters (Chair)
Draft Agenda
WGM Agenda & Planning
- Thursday - Scott, John and Melva unavailable
- will Hugh be available or should we cancel?
Content in Ballot (John)
- Medication Order - there is no link
- John sent in a request to HL7 re: the missing links in the Pharmacy materials about two weeks ago - have heard back that they will update the page. This work has not been completed as of Monday, August 25, 2014.
ISO eRx Requirements
- John/Melva
- defer to August 25
- Melva and John have comments underway and plan to have it ready for Sept meeting.
Action: Melva to review the content.
List Serve Discussion
Brett Marquard - Frequencies - September 4, 2014
File:Medication Frequencies in CDA.pdf
ICH - dosing information question - July 10, 2014
- ICH continues its work to implement the ISO/HL7 ICSR 27953 specification and we need to revisit the appropriate answer for the following item in order to remain consistent with pharmacy best practices for electronic order/prescription and dispensing records. In the case of 30mg t.i.d, which data entry is preferable A, B or is there another option (based upon existing specifications/best practices) that ICH should consider?
- A:
- Dose (number): 30
- Dose (unit): mg
- Number of Units in the Interval : 0.33
- Definition of the Time Interval Unit: day
- B:
- Dose (number): 30
- Dose (unit): mg
- Number of Units in the Interval: 8
- Definition of the Time Interval Unit: hours
- A:
- this has not been answered - need A or B seem to be correct - 3 times per day is not the same as every 8 hours
- ICH continues its work to implement the ISO/HL7 ICSR 27953 specification and we need to revisit the appropriate answer for the following item in order to remain consistent with pharmacy best practices for electronic order/prescription and dispensing records. In the case of 30mg t.i.d, which data entry is preferable A, B or is there another option (based upon existing specifications/best practices) that ICH should consider?
Action Completed: Scott drafted a response for review on the August 11th teleconference. Question answered with no acknowledgement person asking the question.
FHIR DSTU Updates and Resources
- Review List of DSTU updates
- FHIR Profile webinar concerns - Timing not ideal for deliverable, but there is a formal class offered at the next WG meeting. Marla, Melva and John have registered for class.
- Jean Duteau posted updated comments on Dropbox - includes PHER harmonization.
File:Proposed DSTU Changes.xlsx
- Plan to continue to work on DSTU items at the WG meeting.
- PHER/Pharmacy Harmonization Changes will be included with these changes
Action: Jean will include these changes in DSTU changes Action: John to provide list to Jean
Pharmacy Template Project
- Mood Code Discussion - will be included
- John and Melva to continue the work
- Scott reached out to other co-chairs about the push to promote alignment between HL7 Rx templates and NCPDP for the structured sig work.
Pharmacy WG Teleconferece
- September 15 and 22nd meetings are cancelled
