This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Trauma Registry Project FAQ

From HL7Wiki
Revision as of 01:17, 11 August 2014 by Jlyle (talk | contribs) (→‎Modeling)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to Trauma Registry page

Modeling

# Question Answer Status
1 How do we distinguish a patient who has no prehospital section because there was no EMS engagement from a patient who who has no prehospital section because the data is missing? The prehospital section can contain a null flavor of "not applicable" ("NA") meaning that there was no such event (i.e., the patient was a walk-in) or of "unknown" ("UNK") meaning that the information is not available. Resolved
2 How are identifiers assigned?
  • Patient (incident) and document:
    • Set ID (event): root = ACS OID + ".4." + facilityID + ".1"; extension = patient ID
    • Document ID (instance or version of document): root = ACS OID + ".4." + facilityID + ".2"; extension = text, unspecified but unique
    • Effective time: last modified date
    • Version number: do not use
  • The Facility Id should be ACS OID + ".4." + facilityID (ACS-assigned 5-digit ID)
  • Patient id within the record target can be the same as the setId
Resolved
3 Are time zones required on time stamps? Time zones are recommended. This will be a text recommendation in the guide. Open (not yet applied)
4 Are time intervals inclusive or exclusive? The abstract data types specification stipulates no default assumption, but the IVL pattern does support the Boolean properties lowClosed and highClosed that allow the user to specify the boundary type. Closed
5 confirm validation can include constraint identifier in error message Grant reports no, but NTDS identifiers will be provided as they are today closed
6 Do we need a code system for actEncounterCode (FLD) AMS? Open
7 Should we specify section title in IG (content, not just presence) Yes; "should" for title. Text is up to implementer. Open
8 Put last modified date in version rather than create? document.effectiveTime is document generation; should not change with new versions. InjuryEvent.effectiveTime may change if record is updated. The time the event occurred is an observation. Version is also needed; synchrony to be discussed on a future call on workflow. Closed
9 May need to break Transport Mode into two templates One template, two paths; make sure DI can read this. Open
10 Value sets without enumerated members are not listed in appendix: Trifolia issue No. add a fake entry. Closed.
11 Missing LOINCs Most received; some questions on missing items, and address codes requested. Need to choose a deadline for AAAM. Discuss in September. Open
12 Need question codes for coded address elements Question requested from LOINC. FIPS has been retired, asserting that "INCITS" is the new steward of these values, but charges for them. However,ANSI now publishes "ANSI FIPS" for the Census: we'll use these. (http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/ansi.html) Open

Terminology

# Question Answer Status
1 (age units) Minutes in HL7 not in NTDS; Weeks in HL7 not in NTDS I don't recall deciding to add these, so we should probably remove those two.

NEMSIS has minutes but not weeks.

Open
2 Industry incorrect I don't know why LOINC assigned some codes and not others. We should use the NAICS top-level values, not the LOINC answer codes. Open
3 Any long list incomplete (e.g. industry) can we set up Trifolia for this, or do we need to publish a spreadsheet (or use PHIN VADS or VSAC). No: we need to publish some other way. Open
4 Code for “Other Race” is in NTDS but not in HL7 We propose to use "OTH" flavor of null Open
5 LA17105-0 - Patient Chemically paralyzed – In HL7 is not a NTDS code Included based on harmonization with NEMSIS Closed
6 LA17388-2 No airbag present – Not an NTDS code and currently the represented NA – null flavor case. This is the only case where I found a NTDS Null coded into a LOINC code. Included based on harmonization with NEMSIS. And "not present" isn't really a null. Closed
7 Protective Devices: Code Distinction issue – The lap and shoulder belt codes now contain the ‘Only’ description which is not accurate to the existing NTDS codes. Included based on harmonization with NEMSIS Closed
8 Child seat breakdown now in protective devices, no distinct field/element? Included based on harmonization with NEMSIS Closed
9 No code for “Airbag Present” Based on harmonization with NEMSIS--Airbag status contains this information Closed
10 No code for ‘Other’ protective devices We propose to use "OTH" flavor of null Closed
11 Need country codes Use VS 2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.80.63 (HITSP), system 1.0.3166.2.2.2, name Country Codes Closed
12 Need State codes Use VS 2.16.840.1.113883.3.88.12.80.1 (HITSP), system "NA", name FIPS 5-2 (State) (available at http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/ansi_statetables.html) Closed
13 Need County codes Use VS "NA", system "NA", name FIPS 6-4 (County) (available at http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/codes/cou.html) Closed
14 Need City codes Use VS "NA", system "NA", name ANSI Codes for Places (available at http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/codes/place.html). Or, NEMSIS uses GNIS, available at http://geonames.usgs.gov/domestic/download_data.htm Open

Project processes