July 01, 2014 CBCC Conference Call

Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting

Back to CBCC Main Page

Attendees

x	Member Name		x	Member Name		x	Member Name		x	Member Name
x	Johnathan ColemanCBCC Interim Co-Chair		x	Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair		x	Jim KretzCBCC Interim Co-Chair		.	Max WalkerCBCC Co-Chair
.	Wende Baker		.	Bill Braithwaite, MD		x	Kathleen Connor		.	Daniel Crough
x	Steve Eichner		x	Rick Grow		.	Mohammed Jafari		.	Tracy Leeper
.	Lisa Nelson		x	Mike Lardiere		x	Diana Proud-Madruga		.	Harry Rhodes
.	_		.	Lori Simon		x	Ioana Singureanu		.	Tony Weida
.	Maryann Juurlink		.	Steve Daviss		,	Kate Wetherby		x	Neelima Chennamaraja
.	Dina Passman		.	Serafina Versaggi		.	Marlowe Greenberg		.	Chris Clark, WV
.	Ken Ortbals		x	Matt Peeling		.	Nathan Botts		.	Aja Williams
.	Hady Khorasani		x	David Henkel		.	_Amanda Nash		.	_ Craig Winter
x	_David Henkel		x	_ Mike Lardieri		x	_Rick Grow		x	_Bob Yencha

Back to CBCC Main Page

Agenda

1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve [June 17, 2014 CBCC Conference Call]
2. (15 min) review and Request approve for Data Provenance harminization Proposals
3. (15 min) Vendor Meeting - Lori Jim or Ioana
4. (15 min) formation of CBCC WG sub-workgroup to continue work on Data Provenance

Meeting Minutes

Possbility to use the HL7 (toll free) numbers for the Monday S&I/HL7 CBCC Joint Data Provenance Meeting

• remind of Haronization proposals for the July meeting

1. participation functions

• • add two new codes (assembler, reviewer (person) - verifier that has specific responsibility to look at specific/CDA artifact meets requirements)

This has been reviewed by the vocabulary working group. final approval; there were not changes made

1. DPROV CDA Harmonizaton proposal

• • two additional codes for talking about relationship for one document to antohoer preceeding document. the two codes are two future permissionable relationships (COMO/component, XCRPT/excerpts) approved recently
  • SUCC - succeed
  • UPDT - update both are not currently used in CDA but may be used in future for FHIR

Accept recommendations from vocabulary working group

• create a concept domain (which will be bound
• keep certain ActStatus codes; they are active and not a state

MOTION: CBCC approve final submission of the presented proposed--having been vetter by vocabulary (Kathleen/Johnathan) Objections: none; Abstentions: none; Motion approved: 10

Discussion: how do you identify reviewer? (Jim) concern is that assembler/reviewer--how are they identified...its this person over here are we looking at a name? NPI number?

• the assembler is unrelated to the reviewer; they have to be in the same code system. (additional response not recorder) . This is a person (if provider then an NPI number); ideally a personal, individual provider

• Vendor Meeting
  • no requestions were received during the vendor meeting
  • majority were of adopting DSM-5 and what future holds with SAMHSA

Article: .... certification testing it appears there is trouble in river city. as far as the body of reviewers could tell, the certifications fo testing are not going very well. the 91CCAs did not interact very well