Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting

Meeting Information

Member Name	Present	Member Name	Present	Member Name	Present
Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair	x	Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair	x	Max Walker CBCC Co-Chair	.
Michael Alonso	.	Wende Baker	x	Bill Braithwaite, MD	.
Kathleen Connor		Daniel Crough		[mailto: David Bergman	x
Steve Eichner		Brian Handspicker	.	Mohammed Jafari
Jim Kretz	.	Mike Lardiere	.	Tracy Leeper
Lisa Nelson		Diana Proud-Madruga		Harry Rhodes
Ken Salyards		Lori Simon	x	Ioana Singureanu
Tony Weida	.	Kate Wetherby	.	Rick Grow	x
Maryann Juurlink	x	Steve Daviss	x

(05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
Privacy Value Sets - Richard
Schizophrenia Model, Major Depressive Disorder DAMs, next steps, participation, incorporation - Lori
APA Report on Vendors - Lori
Data Enhancements Update for BH Model - Vendors, Nebraska, Arizona - Wende
(5 min) Other Business

Schizophrenia Model, Major Depressive Disorder DAMs, - Lori

Lori attended the conference call with CIC work group. They are working on the Schizophrenia and MDD DAMs, and were ready to start on BiPolar.
They were very receptive, CIC is happy to coordinate efforts into the BH Model but Lori's question was: why were they creating separate models for each illness as opposed to one overreaching model? Basically, it’s a funding issue. They’ve been getting funding for individual illnesses from both the FDA and NIH.
Lori will take a look at their model at the meeting in San Antonio in January and see where their model can be merged with your DAM.

Discussion: In terms of CIC use cases--what are they looking at? Drug utilization? Patient specific results?

Response: use cases stem primarily from research
- there is an overlap of what is being collected clinically and what is being used for research
- we can indicate the requirements for each of the settings (this has been done with the APA)
- an individual requiremnt can have more than one setting; can envision this setting for research, criminal justice or whatever
- they can be dialed in as 'required', 'nice to have', 'not required' (or something similiar)
- if interested, Lori would like to see where the APA Functional Model and the BH Model can also be merged
We then tie the use cases to the functionality, then we will have traceability between the two

Lori will be taking a look at each of our models and where they may be merged (will report out at the San Antonio meeting in January 2014)
will go nicely with the Gap Analysis work (between BH DAM, APA, others)

ONC BH Effort

CBCC (SAMHSA) is contributing to this effort
MaryAnn providedlinks to the Report by the Criminal Justice and Health Collaboration Project

APA Report on Vendors - Lori ACAP and (for the EHR committee meeting)

will be hosting a meeting (webinar
letting vendors know what is happening in BH to whet their appetites to help them know who to go to for requirements
webinar will be open to as many vendors as possible
- those vendors who are interested, will be invited to a subsequent meeting about where we go from here, so that information is more developed
- targeted for mid-March 2014 (APA sponsored meeting)

Data Enhancements Update for BH Model - Vendors, Nebraska, Arizona - Wende

Mike Ladarier forwarded a documents that he felt would help with the interoperability requirment
hope to advance the _____

Texas Councils of Community Centers (TCCC) = MRDD and Behavioral Health

BH 'HELP' record

will have a number of different social services
expanding the scope of the behavior information (criminal justice, homeless, children)
information will be usefule when measuring quality outcomes (in terms of outcomes)
- there are 10 different quality measures that are being worked on in TX
- for NU3 there are also 10 items
MU seems to heading this way for measuring quality outcomes
concern expressed veering from behavioral health (and using behavioral help)--may result in resistence; both are important but they should be separate (per Steve Daviss)
requiriements which are not HIPAA based, how do we get that information in--even if reporting to a physicians, is this outside the requirements for the physician or the policy of the school
- this should all follow consent rules, sharing
(Wende) we are looking at these data sets as a means of interoperability. we want to facilite the bundling for especialy those of high risk. This is more important that establishing quality measures. We have a lot of flexibility for our data measuress---but we don't want to diminish utilization or the services provided for the clients/patients. I would be careful of getting too high a standards that is too difficult for some systems to apply
- (Richard) good point.

Meeting Adjourned: 0959 PST --Suzannegw 18:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)