This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
April 23, 2013 Security Working Group Conference Call
Contents
Security Working Group Meeting
Attendees
- Kathleen Connor
- Mike Davis Security Co-chair
- Reed Gelzer
- Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
- Adrianne James
- Don Jorgenson
- John Moehrke Security Co-chair
- Diana Proud-Madruga
- Tony Weida
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- (15 min) HL7 Security WGM Agenda DRAFT
- (15 min) Ballot Update
- (15 min) Item3
- (05 min) Other Business
Meeting Minutes
Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
HL7 Security WGM Agenda
- SOA Joint
- no agenda items to fill joint meeting; meeting will be postponed/rescheduled to next WGM
- Tony Weida will be available Tuesday and Thursday
- Potential walk-in subject for CBCC (not resolved yet per Mike); for joint MON Q3/Q4 meeting
- BH = behavioral health
- Add placeholder for Q4 International report out
- is there time for joint CBCC-Security ballot reconciliation? (re: Security and Privacy DAM) **must determine when Ioana/Serafina availability)
- Serafina / Ioana needed for recommendations for the Security/privacy DAM (add to Monday Q3/Q4 joint)
- reporting out on FHIR Security Model (John Moehrke)
Is John coming to the FHIR Saturday/Sunday sessions (questions from Mike); there is activity on Saturday and an connect-a-thon on Sunday. Mike is planning on coming in on Friday to attend the FHIR activities. FHIR tutorials will be occuring during Saturday/Sunday.
- Placeholders for ballot reconciliation (Tuesday/Thursday) dependant on comments received
- Dedicate Q3/Q4 Tuesday and Q1/Q2 Thursday for <Security> Ballot Reconciliation
- Joint EHR - structured data topic; material that Doug Fridmsa had presented to the HITP at one time. Decomposing clinical information into descrete units (PCAST) Intermaountain and others are involved. opportunity to consider to privacy and security to consider for moving small information around (led by Stan Huff, NIH work and other) Also related to data labeling project. its needs to be onsistent aross all the clinical ifnormation. theattribures need to have structure to them; additionaly we can talk about the NIST document on Attribute atrribute cone and how it relates to HCS and the need to meld with clinical data.
ACTION ITEM: Kathleen can speak (couple of slides) to this subject / will work with Reed-- to get people to think aobut what is going on in this arena.
