November 22, 2011 CBCC Conference Call

Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting

Back to CBCC Main Page

Attendees

• Kathleen Connor Financial Management Co-chair
• Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
• Jim Kretz
• John Moehrke Security Co-chair
• Ioana Singureanu
• Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair
• Serafina Versaggi

Back to CBCC Main Page

Agenda

1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
2. (50 min) Behavior Health CCD Project - Joint with Financial Management (FM)

Minutes

Back to CBCC Main Page Today's discussion focused on the purpose and content of the Informative ballot related to the Behavioral Health "CCD"

• Ballot will be comprised of the requirements analysis for recommended content for a Behavioral Health CCD
  • The analysis will define the scope (in scope/out of scope) and requirements describing the minimum or core data to be exchange between Behavioral Health providers and Behavioral Health and primary and specialty care providers
• We are following the same process used to develop the DSTU Composite Security and Privacy Domain Analysis Model (DAM) and CDA R2 for Consent Directives

1. Perform requirements analysis to draft a domain analysis model - referring to State of Arizona Department of Health Services Demographic and Outcome Data Set User Guide (DUG), Federal Health Information Model (FHIM) Behavioral Health domain, SAMHSA Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) and SAMHSA National Outcome Measures (NOMs)
2. Review/refine DAM
3. Map DAM content to the structure of a CDA/CCD document

• We will refer to the Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2.0 Consolidated CDA Templates (US Realm),December 2011 to ensure that we are in synch with current U.S. Meaningful Use efforts
  • This version is slated for publication following a vote on the Structured Documents WG call. Date is not yet scheduled, but anticipated to be either December 1 or December 8, 2011.
  • Sign up for the Structured Documents list to receive agenda announcements
• In addition to the domain analysis content, Richard requested that an additional artifact be generated, spreadsheet like format, to describe the minimum/core content along with rationale for including in the Informative draft and marked essential now or essential future.
  • Looking for feedback on core content from reviewers
  • Use this format to elicit input from SAMHSA stakeholders to ensure that we have covered the minimum/core data requirements
• Because we will be harmonizing with the CDA Consolidated Template which