20100715 arb minutes

Architecture Board July 15, 2010 Late Call

logistics

Time: 6:00PM U.S. Eastern Please consult http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock for your local times

1. Please join my meeting. https://www2.gotomeeting.com/join/739071786

Or go to www.gotomeeting.com At the top of the page click on the join meeting button

Then enter Meeting ID: 739-071-786

2. Join the conference call: Dial 770-657-9270 Passcode 854126#

Agenda

• Call to order
• Approval of Agenda
• Approval of Minutes July 8, 2010 Minutes
• Update from Charlie on Intro.
• Update from Jane on GF.
• Update from Cecil on IF
• Dita project strategy - Karen Smith
• OHT pilot value proposition survey - Jane Curry
• Other business and planning for next meeting
• Adjournment

Minutes

• Ron Parker chaired, Jane Curry, Andy Bond, Cecil Lynch, Cliff Thompson, Karen Smith attending
• Jane moved approval and Cecil seconded today's agenda
• Jane moved approval and Andy seconded minutes of July 8, 2010
• Charlie unavailable to provide update on the Intro
• Jane reported that the GF is nearing completion but will be at least the end of next week
• Cecil reported that the initial draft had been released to a few ArB members and based on feedback another draft should be ready early next week for general ArB review
• Karen walked through the current draft of the SAIF DITA project strategy document. Comments were around the peer review process and whether the ArB needed another broad review formal process or whether targeted requests for peer review responses were an acceptlbe alternative. Ron to see whether Charlie could take that question to the TSC. - Jane moved to accept the deliverable as an interim deliverable for this milestone. Andy Bond seconded.
• Jane Curry provided on an update on the expected process of the OHT architecture value proposition survey. From the comments received to date, the term "architecture" in the survey has been confused with the definition of a technical platform and many of the questions were answered on that basis. These responses will be sent to the OHT Architecture Project and the survey will be reworked for clarity and to make more of the assumptions explicit before it is formally released by OHT executive. The formal survey will need to be answered from the TSC and CTO perspective, especially in regards to whether or not and if so, how, HL7 will use and enterprise architecture approach within HL7. The ArB may need to advise the TSC on the formal response. The expectation is the survey will be sent out and responses expected back by the next OHT Board meeting which is scheduled a few days before the HL7 WG meeting in Boston.
• Ron indicated he would be on vacation for 3 weeks and will be talking to Charlie Mead about chairing meetings during that period. The next meeting is expected to be in the early timeslot next week.