This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

PA Interdependent Registries

From HL7Wiki
Revision as of 18:47, 30 September 2010 by Gseppala (talk | contribs) (New page: ==Introduction== The primary implementer of the HL7 V3 role-based registries appears to be Canada. Canada has production implementations of Client (AKA Patient) and Provider registries. At...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Introduction

The primary implementer of the HL7 V3 role-based registries appears to be Canada. Canada has production implementations of Client (AKA Patient) and Provider registries. At the May 2010 Working Group Meeting Ron Parker of Canada Infoway gave a presentation to the Patient Administration work group addressing lessons learned and future architectural plans for Canada. See Ron's presentation in the 20100517_PA_WMG_Attachements.zip file.

The most significant finding is that real world applications require that different types of registries work together. The challenge for Patient Administration is to define interactions that span a number of topics:

  • Person topic (DSTU in Patient Administration domain)
  • Patient topic (DSTU in Patient Administration domain)
  • Service Delivery Location (DSTU in Patient Administration domain)
  • Provider topic (Normative R1 in Personnel Management domain)
  • Organization topic (Normative R1 in Personnel Management domain)

Also, the Canadian Notional Architecture includes two additional registries for which a standard has not been defined. It seems possible that these additional registries would fall under the scope of a work group other than Patient Administration. Defining interactions that would also include these registries could present a technical challenge.

  • Health Service
  • Health Program

Business Case

Use Cases

Existing Standards

Analysis Documents