This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Requirements-Value Set Conformance
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
When defining the set of codes allowed for a given element there's actually more to do than just referencing the set of codes. There's also a question of defining the conformance expectations for how the referenced set of codes are expected to be used. I.e. Are implementations restricted to the set of codes specified, must they support all of the codes, etc.
Requirement | When identifying the set of codes associated with an element, there's a need to identify the total set of codes that are potentially allowed to be sent, regardless of whether all implementations will support all codes. |
Rationale |
|
MIF | VocabularyValueSetBinding/baseValueSet |
Requirement | When identifying the set of codes associated with an element, there's a need to know what subset of those must be fully supported by implementations. |
Rationale |
|
MIF | VocabularyValueSetBinding/minimumValueSet |
Requirement | When defining a constraint on an existing set of vocabulary, there's a need to differentiate between codes that are not supported (those outside the base value set) and will likely raise an error if transmitted and those that simply won't be processed but will not result in an error. |
Rationale |
|
MIF | VocabularyValueSetBinding/ignoredValueSet |
Requirement | When defining a set of codes for use in a specification, there's a need to differentiate whether the set of codes is considered exhaustive (i.e. all codes must come from the specified value set) or as the base preferred set that must be used if an appropriate code is available. |
Rationale |
|
Methodology | Coding Strength |