20170606 arb minutes

ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)

Agenda

1. Call to order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda and May 30, 2017 Minutes
4. Management
5. Governance
6. Methodology
   • Joint with SGB to discuss Interoperability Specification Matrix (ISM)
7. Other business and planning
   • June 13 Continue Ballot Recon
   • June 20 Review Mission and Charter
   • Open issues
8. Adjournment

Meeting Information

HL7 ARB Work Group Meeting Minutes Location: Telcon		Date: 20160606 Time: 4:00pm U.S. Eastern
Facilitator	Julian, Tony	Note taker(s)	Julian, Tony
Attendee	Name	Affiliation
X	Bond,Andy	NEHTA
R	Constable, Lorraine	Constable Consulting Inc.
.	Hyland, Mario	AEGIS
X	Julian, Tony	Mayo Clinic
X	Knapp, Paul	Pknapp Consulting
X	Kubick, Wayne	HL7 CTO
.	Loyd, Patrick	ICode Solutions
X	Lynch, Cecil	Accenture
R	Milosevic, Zoran	Deontik Pty Ltd
X	Stechishin,Andy	CANA Software and Service Ltd.
SGB
.	Kreisler, Austin	Leidos
.	Hamm, Russ	IMO
.
Legend
X	Present
.	Absent
R	Regrets
Quorum Requirements (Co-chair + 3) Met: Yes

1. Approval of Agenda and May 30, 2017 Minutes
   • • Agenda approved by mutual consent
   • Motion to approve the minuts(Andy S/ Austin)
   • Vote 4-0-0
2. Methodology
   • Joint with SGB to discuss Interoperability Specification Matrix (ISM)
     • Tony presented the ISM diagram
     • Discussed task - Provide guidance to groups to map their artifacts to the ISM.
     • Depends on the work: If oriented for family instead of line. Line interested in logical models, Family interested in implementation..
     • Platform oriented see logical modeling as overhead with little value.
     • Product line has an interest in logical consistency within the line.
     • Across HL7 there is a higher order - of which Family/Lines don't concern themselves.
     • FHIR model is an abstraction, and is not implementable. From the outside you see it as core to FHIR, in implementable view.
     • Value depends on your perspective, e.g. FHIR, CDA, V2.
     • SGB is interested in the cross product family consistency, working through product families.
     • SGB is concerned with lines that need consistency.
     • Don't see those as lines - good things to do in order to have lines.
     • Looking at a domain, what is the binding conceptual foundation, so talked about together they wont create inconsistencies. CDA, FHIR see it as an inhibitor, decided by others.
     • Target audience - Product Families? families articulate their material into the grid.
     • Narrows the focus to immediate future.
     • Helps to surface what is hard.
     • Challenge is for domains - this is the issue they deal with, different product families across the domain. For a family the core interest is the implementation - technical platform has been chosen. You can grow the interest with e.g. FHIR which needs to work with other platforms. Need to reconcile a set of behaviors.
     • If the logical model is FHIR, we will take out the platform bits, and just have the information elements.
     • This group needs to map one and map it, but not FHIR.
     • There was a CDA exercise to do that. (Keith Boone facilitated).
     • Worked on PPT.
     • Next week put into the grid - may find a home, add examples, friendlier names.
3. Other business and planning
   • June 13 Continue Ballot Recon
   • June 20 Review Mission and Charter
   • Open issues
     • Tony will send to Anne, for SGB consumption.
     • Schedule monthly
4. Adjournment