This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

MnM Minutes CC 20070615

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Attendees

  • Kathleen Connor
  • Lee Coller
  • Ioana Singureanu
  • Lloyd McKenzie
  • Rick Chesnik
  • John Cooper
  • Dale Nelson


Agenda

  • (Lloyd): Administrative topic: Dynamic Model - agenda
  • (Lloyd): Hot Topics: Act Reference - postponed for next WGM because this topic requires input from INM.

Mottion to accept agenda: (No objections)

Administrative Topic: Dynamic Model Discussion

Concerns regarding desinging system behaviors are pervasive in HL7 (from application roles to committee-specific complex interactions to functional service specifications). We have a variety of constructs (Applications Roles, SOA Services, interactions) that require dynamic views and behavioral model constructs such as interfaces, ports, and subsystems.

The agenda for next week must address the needs of a variety of stakeholders:

  • Support for the processes specified in the HDF regarding behavioral models
  • SOA Service support and relating interfaces to Application roles
  • Ability to describe complex interactions for specific domains
  • Leverage the notation and design to describe a variety of in, in/out, output parameters and return types
  • We need to ensure that our design constructs are supported by implementation technologies (e.g. WSDL, WS-CDL, WS-BPEL)

Dynamic Model Agenda (Harmonization Meeting June 21-22, 2007)

The CBC form, as submitted is available on this Wiki and also at http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/mnm/minutes/CBC_INFO_MNM_2007MAY-Complete 20070119.pdf.


=Thursday, June 21st

Q1: 9 - 10:30 am EST

Inventory of where we are with the dynamic model List of know issues


Q2: Services and Application roles

How do we relate operations (in interfaces) to

Q3: Identify artifacts that will affected by the changes. Documenting and specifying complex interaction patterns  activity diagram were deemed too complex


Q4: Complex interaction patterns

Service orchestration vs. choreography We will not go into the solution for run-time representation of system (e.g. WS-CDL WS-BPEL). We will focus on the design time


Friday AM

Q1: Develop approaches to make this real

 The methodology will be linked back to the product lifecycle management project in the HDT  Select the notation

Q2 : Opens session


Minutes by --Ioana Singureanu 14:50, 15 June 2007 (CDT)