This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Open ATS Issues

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Translations: add "derived from .. ID" attribute ?, much like acknowledgementOf. See also MCCI line-item 157.
  • Message.id "sameness" discussion after transformation by a Gateway.
    • New motion of MnM: 20060113: "At the semantic (or: business process level) the contents of the Transmission wrapper, with the exception of InteractionID, are not relevant when determining if 2 interactions are the same. At the transmission-level 2 Transmissions are the same if they have the same Transmission.id."
    • This has the consequence that the sameness of Transmission.id is not linked to the wider topic of semantic-transmission sameness.
  • Use of the AttentionLine class to add route-tracing information in a Transmission that's being routed/gatewayed to its destination. Are Gateways/Bridges able to add their own information to the Transmission Wrapper in the form of an additional AttentionLine?

(Miroslav) The items and concepts that are listed below represent some of the major challenges for the ATS document. They are addressed in many Action Items with the InM as well. We list them here for information only - the official proposals are contained with the new version of ATS document that is up for the January 2007 ballot cycle (ATS C1 R2). Please post your balloot votes to that document.


Miroslav Koncar 08:00, 21 Apr 2006 (CDT) The most recent developments have resulted in the new HL7 Messaging Architecture that is to be discussed at the Out of Cycle Meeting. Plese refer to the separate page HL7 Messaging Architecture for details.